[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

On 06.04.2026 01:50, Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users wrote:
>>>>>> On April 5, 2026 Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Actually, when apt installs something new, it considers Recommends:
>> for *all* packages it installs.  So if A depends on B, and B
>> recommends C, and you install A, C will be installed too (unless you
>> disable installing recommends).  Ditto for the case when A
>> *recommends* B, etc.
> 
>> In short, by default apt installs Recommends for everything it
>> installs.
> 
> What you've written here does not match the situation I described.
> 
> What if, before asking to install A, B had already been installed,
> but without C?

If you earlier install B without installing its recommendations, - sure,
apt wont install these recommendations when you later install something
else which depends on (or recommends) B.

The whole Recommends thing, and skipping installing recommendations,
assumes that the user knows what he's doing, and can deal with the
possible consequences.  In this particular case, just by reading the
error message, I would immediately see which mechs are available to
begin with - like, asking google how to list installed sasl auth
mechanisms.  Or something like this.

Thanks,

/mjt
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]