[pfx] Re: Question on lmdb - setup
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.postfix.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06.04.2026 06:31, Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza via Postfix-users wrote:
> Dear listmembers,
> I have a question regarding the correct setup of the lmdb - files. Is it
> correct (and sufficient ...) to execute a script like this:
>
> LMDBFILES="access canonical helo_access relay_ccerts relay \
> relocated sasl_passwd sender_canonical transport virtual"
>
> for i in ${LMDBFILES}; do
> ${POSTMAP} lmdb:${PFROOTDIR}/$i
> done
>
> and the (lmdb) files will be used automatically instead of the ascii -
> versions? Or do I have to execute additional steps to have postfix consider
> those lmdb - files on startup?
Postfix does not use ascii versions of these files. It always uses a
hashed version, - the question is the algorithm/format of the hashed
version, - is it btree: or lmdb: or cdb: or something else. And this
depends on the software available on your system and the way you use
these maps.
> Would some kind soul explain the difference between the lmdb - files and the
> "normal" ascii - data?
A hashed version has a fast-lookup index in one way or another, usually
it is some binary form. Ascii files are suitable for editing, while a
hashed version is good for looking up individual entries.
Thanks,
/mjt
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]