[pfx] Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:21:32 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.postfix.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, we are hitting a wall with address verification to a backend server that does not like double-bounce@domain as the address verification sender. We have tried to change the parameter from its default value to null sender (<>) and an explicit address via postconf and by editing main.cf with "postfix reload" and with a full restart but the probes continue to reach the backend as double-bounce@$maydomain. We have even added double-bounce as a masquerade exception with no success. We are using postfix 3.5.25 Relevant log line: Jun 11 13:18:46 frontmta postfix/smtpd[1111697]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail.example.net[192.168.0.2]: 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: host backmta.example.com[172.16.3.14] said: 550 5.1.0 <[email protected]>: Sender address rejected: example.com (in reply to RCPT TO command); from=<[email protected]> to= <[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.example.net> [root@frontmta ~]# postconf -n address_verify_map = btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify address_verify_relayhost = address_verify_sender = [email protected] address_verify_transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/add_vrf_transport_maps alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases command_directory = /usr/sbin compatibility_level = 2 daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix dkim_milter = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 dmarc_milter = inet:127.0.0.1:8893 header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks html_directory = no inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = all mail_owner = postfix mailbox_size_limit = 104857600 mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix manpage_directory = /usr/share/man masquerade_domains = $mydomain masquerade_exceptions = root, postfix, double-bounce message_size_limit = 104857600 meta_directory = /etc/postfix mydestination = $myhostname mydomain = example.com mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/1, 10.0.0.0/8 newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix non_smtpd_milters = $dkim_milter parent_domain_matches_subdomains = queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix/README_FILES relay_domains = example.com sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix/samples sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix setgid_group = postdrop shlib_directory = /usr/lib64/postfix smtp_bind_address = 172.16.200.2 smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt smtp_tls_CApath = /etc/pki/tls/certs smtp_tls_security_level = may smtpd_authorized_xclient_hosts = 172.16.200.14 smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining, check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/cliacc, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net, permit smtpd_delay_reject = yes smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = vrfy smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/heloacc, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname, permit smtpd_milters = $dkim_milter $dmarc_milter smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_policy_service unix:private/policy-spf, smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/access, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/denylist, reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/fullchain.pem smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/tls/private/postfix.key smtpd_tls_security_level = may strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes tcp_windowsize = 65535 transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450 unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550 virtual_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual1 hash:/etc/postfix/virtual2 Ideas anyone? Thanks! -- Victoriano Giralt Retired sysadmin ================================================================== Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure ? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ? _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]