Discussion from Clamav list
Craig Daters <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:15:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <a06020406bc52a6e37a54@[192.168.1.34]> |
There is a discussion going on over at the ClamAV users list about ASK (see below), and I was just curious...this discussion prompted me to wonder. What if the majority of forged email address are real. Will innocent users be getting these confirmation requests? > > >I just tried to reply to your mail but got this response. >> >> yes, i'm using ASK for spam protection. The meaning of the automatic >> response is: reply this email and you'll be added to rbellora's >> whitelist. I received your email anyway. > >So, how does that help protect you from spam? It sounds like your system >receives a spam email from some unknown and probably forged address, delivers >the spam to you anyway, and then sends its own message back to the forged >adderss, to some poor innocent who didn't send the spam in the first >place...? > >I'm not sure I see why this is a good idea (or have I misunderstood how it >works?) >>I'm not sure I see why this is a good idea (or have I misunderstood >>how it works?) >> >it works like this: any email received not in my whitelist is >blocked until the sender replies to the automatic response, or i >unblock it myself and then is delivered. I made a script (it runs >once an hour on business hours) to notify me when there is some new >email that does not seem spam (according to SpamAssassin) waiting, >sending me a link to an html report form of what's pending. Using >the form, i delete what's spam (with option to including the sender >in an ignorelist or blacklist), and, if there's some nonspam i >deliver and optionally whitelist the sender. I like it > > it works like this: any email received not in my whitelist is blocked >> until the sender replies to the automatic response > >Doesn't that result in your mail server either attempting delivery to >addresses which fail, or successfully delivering to innocent (forged) >addresses, in response to most of the spam you get? > >I've always been doubtful about any auto-response mechanisms, considering how >much spam (and viruses) comes from forged sender addresses these days. >>Doesn't that result in your mail server either attempting delivery >>to addresses which fail, or successfully delivering to innocent >>(forged) addresses, in response to most of the spam you get? >> >yes it does. Regarding forged address, they receive hundreds of >bounces anyway. I don't see failed delivery as a problem (the >bounces are discarded by ASK) -- -- Craig Daters ([email protected]) Systems Administrator West Press Printing 1663 West Grant Road Tucson, Arizona 85745-1433 Tel: 520-624-4939 Fax: 520-624-2715 www.westpress.com -- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click