Re: Why SRS really sucks

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, David Woodhouse wrote:

> But mangling the recipient address unnecessarily would be bad -- there's
> useful information in there which you'd be obscuring, so it's best to do
> it only when you _need_ to.

What exactly is your point? Recipiet address exist solely for purposes
of providing routing information on how to deliver the message. What
different does it make if you see [email protected] or [email protected]
as long as message will get to Tom (btw - we're talking about RCPT TO 
address not pretty visible address in To field that user will see).

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
[email protected]