Re: Reject the Welfare/Warfare State

"Karl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <014101cb8127$64d21bb0$2e765310$@com>
That is actually part of why this is so complex, the fact that all of the facts
and such are open to interpretation, and can be cherry picked to make a point.

We never really know what we are dealing with.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bruce Geerdes
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:05 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Peter T. Chattaway
<petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2% on their income versus 17% for
>> everyone else?
>
> Well, not *quite* everyone else.  Isn't a wide swath of the American public
> supposed to be earning too little to be income-taxed?

Yeah, no idea whether that 17% is average of taxpayers or average of everyone.

--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.