Re: Obama takes opportunity Palin missed
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I like that speech a lot. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:56 AM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Obama takes opportunity Palin missed >The whole thing would have blown over almost immediately. Now, she's kept the focus largely on her to the detriment of the actual tragedy itself. She's not bigger than the deaths of the innocents, but she's pulling as many headlines as the event itself. < Wait a minute. She had a choice on whether to respond or not but those putting her in the headlines don't have a choice? That's a little unfair donchathink? No one forced Kos, MSNBC, the NYT's, etc. to make this story about her at all,yet they did. And she gets blamed for the focus of the headlines? And now this: http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/14/shooting-victim-says-beck-palin-angle-got-thei r-first-target/ You know what, I agree with you she made the wrong speech. She should have been much shorter: ''To those of you who linked me to this shooting - FUCK YOU!" And then she could have given interviews on it and when asked about it say: "What didn't you understand - the fuck or the you?" Mike F. (knows he won't be elected to anything ever) _____ From: Johne Cook <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 1:46:44 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Obama takes opportunity Palin missed On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: **by saying nothing she was being soundly criticized of being afraid to admit her guilt. So you are upset she had a flag? Really? Having a flag makes it political? Really? I can understand the President having a flag there for his addresses to the country. She doesn't represent the country. Right now, she doesn't even represent her state. But I've never been a huge 'wrap yourself in the flag' guy anyway, so (right or wrong) I'm consistent with my preferences. **I am starting to think you read the complaints about it and did not watch it. She had 4 paragraphs lamenting the shooting. Were they bad? What about the final two calling for the nation to come together? Bad also? I admit I found it humorous that she was pleading for the nation to come together, and in doing so achieved the opposite. Again, I'm not a Sarah-hater. I just now what works for me, and what doesn't, and this speech didn't work for me. **and yet she has been branded as the person most at fault. She had no choice but to respond. Of course, she had a choice. She had the ability to let her Saturday FB comments speak for themselves and otherwise stand pat. The whole thing would have blown over almost immediately. Now, she's kept the focus largely on her to the detriment of the actual tragedy itself. She's not bigger than the deaths of the innocents, but she's pulling as many headlines as the event itself. Johne Cook | http://raygunrevival.com <http://raygunrevival.com/> | http://authorculture.blogspot.com <http://authorculture.blogspot.com/> | -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot