Re: This is what scares me more than anything

"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
" If we need to raise transportation revenue, just raise gas tax rather than
try to implement mile tax."

Once again, punishing bad behavior?

That, is all I am suggesting is "preachy.  Owning a gasoline car is not bad
behavior.

Bottom line, I already pay a consumption tax on my gas.  I accept that.
But, why should my gas taxes make the roads safer for the electric vehicle
who uses the same roads while he is also getting an annual tax incentive?

Sorry, no.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Bruce Geerdes
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 10:34 AM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] This is what scares me more than anything

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mike Findlay
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Even if I disagree with his, (to me), cavalier attitude about more 
> govt spending.
>

Oh now, I was only being cavalier about it if my conditions were met:

1. All transportation taxes are being used to maintain infrastructure 2.
There is not enough revenue from said taxes to maintain infrastructure

There is plenty of wiggle room in there to argue there *is* enough revenue,
it's just being used inefficiently. ;)

My main points (lost in all the preachiness evidently) were:

(a) I want transportation to pay for transportation. I don't want govt to
subsidize transportation from other areas, and I don't want transportation
to subsidize other areas.

(b) If we need to raise transportation revenue, just raise gas tax rather
than try to implement mile tax.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.