Well, the fact is, Bush DID endorse the idea of starting with pre-1967 borders, just as Obama has suggested doing. William is wrong in his assertion that Bush did not.
But-again- the fact is, he didn't not accuse me of supporting genocide for my comment comparing Bush and Obama on the subject. He was doing so to avoid actually addressing my simple questions of "what about the speech is so bad?" He did try and say something about the lack of security in the pre-1967 borders...but one of the conditions Obama brought up was making sure they had secure borders. So what was his problem with the speech? He failed to ever address that with any info, and jumped to accusing me of supporting genocide. Based on what, I am unsure, I neither said nor implied support of Palestine or disdain for Israel. But the way he reacted you would think I had gone on a Mel Gibson style drunken rant against the Jews and called him sugartits.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Swenson <[email protected]>
To: 'DADL (off topic)' <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 8:21 am
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Fwd: Wow... My first time defending someone...
I guess I read that quote as different.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.