Re: Marine killed in his own home
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Vanessa Guerena says she heard noise outside their home about 9 a.m. Thursday and woke her husband who had just gone to bed after working a 12-hour shift at the Asarco Mine, she said. There were no sirens or shouts of "police," she said." >The helmet cam video clearly disputes that.< There was 8-10 seconds of siren moments before the raid. Police siren, car alarm? I lived in lousy neighborhood for awhile a number of years ago - police sirens were routine and we never thought anything about them. Shouts of police? The camera/mic is a ways away so it is hard to say for sure what was said by the cops at the door, but "clearly disputes that" ain't clear at all. Apparently the neighbors don't recall hearing a siren, which is completely understandable if you have ever lived in a marginal neighborhood. http://www.theagitator.com/2011/05/26/video-of-the-pima-county-swat-raid/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+radleybalko+%28The+Agitator%29 >I speak in no way of justifying the raid or his death. But one initial thought is that with sirens blaring outside and police identifying themselves loudly, it is an act of stupidity to arm yourself. < They weren't identifying themselves loudly immediately before entering. There sure wasn't any shouting going on. When you are in your own home doing nothing illegal you have every right in the world to arm yourself if you feel threatened. Assholes wearing a badge does not deprive you of that basic right. Note he didn't come out shooting and there isn't even evidence that he pointed the weapon at the pigs. >I also want to point out that fact he had not shot and the gun was on safety is not relevant, nor is his being a Marine. That fact he was holding it did make him a threat and in many other settings if a police officer saw a man holding a weapon there would be justification for deadly force.< No it wouldn't. Holding a weapon is not an absolute justification for deadly force. Deadly force has to be proportionate and it wasn't. 71 shots to none, into a home with possible unarmed occupants, including shots fired blindly by some cowboy pig is not justifiable deadly force. >The real issue we should be debating is why his home was selected for a raid in the first place, because that element is the primary point of failure if he had no drugs or money. In almost all of the cases I have been reading about that has been a huge factor.< That isn't the "real" issue we should be debating, it just adds to the despicable conduct of these jackbooted thugs. Not only did they act murderously, they are entirely without any excuse. http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/22/jose-guerena-evidence-dont-buy Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot