Re: Just as I thought
"nicholas a. evans" <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:16:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jackasses driving drunk concerns everyone who uses the road. -- Nick On Jun 22, 2011 9:27 AM, "Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> wrote: > Timing is everything. He was an asshole for tweeting that when he did; it > didn't and doesn't concern him and to stick his half a face, (I'm not wrong am > I? He does have only half a face - granted it is a result of a terrible disease > - nonetheless it is true), in there the way he did was mean spitited. Obviously > that's my opinion, but it coincides with the other impressions I have of him > -arrogant, narcissistic and narrow minded. > > Mike F. > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Johne Cook <[email protected]> > To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, June 21, 2011 8:40:46 PM > Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Just as I thought > > Roger explains: > http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/06/_bam_margera_i_just_lost.html > > Again, was what he actually said wrong? I don't think so. Insensitive, > perhaps, but my tolerance for drunk drivers is nil. If he was some average > Joe driving drunk, he was a jackass. If he was a celebrity driving drunk > whom many people genuinely liked, guess what? Still a jackass. > > Ebert was perhaps crass for pointing out the truth, but that makes the truth > no less relevant. Sorry he's dead and that his passenger paid the ultimate > price for taking that ride with him. Still, he had a history of driving too > fast, and he'd been drinking before he left the bar. Roger's not a villain > in my book for commenting on that. > > Johne Cook > | http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |* > * > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I saw that Ebert doubled down. >> >> Well, it seems that he meant it in the way I originally interpreted it. >> >> > He regrets if his tweet was taken as cruel. Nothing more >> weaselly/assholish >> > than the non-apology apology. >> >> I'd think it more weaselly to offer an insincere apology. He stands by >> what he said, he's sorry people thought it cruel, he didn't mean it >> that way, what more can he say? >> >> -- >> dadl-ot mailing list >> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot >> > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot