Re: CVS access or Project Progress

shutterbug <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:38:21 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.centericq
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

>  - Multiple accounts per protocol
>  - Protocol abstraction, so we can add any protocol by
> just writing a wrapper around it using a common
> interface.

This sounds like a good idea. If the abstraction is good, it could
lead us directly to the support of multiple accounts per protocol.
A multiple account would than be just another instance of the
particular account class. As centericq will deal with more abstract
classes, it won't matter which class is underneath it. (I didn't
look at the code dealing with this issue so far, so I don't know
how much work it will be or what is possible)

>  - UI separation, so that we could plug any other
> frontend to the centericq backend.

Decoupling and more code modularity is always a good idea, but I agree
with Tiger!P, this should be some kind of a low priority task.

Cheers,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
Cicq mailing list
Cicq-xGejAJT2w6wWP6gT/[email protected]
http://mailman.linuxpl.org/mailman/listinfo/cicq
Questions? Check the FAQ first: http://centericq.de/faq/