Re: CVS access or Project Progress
shutterbug <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:38:21 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.centericq |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, > - Multiple accounts per protocol > - Protocol abstraction, so we can add any protocol by > just writing a wrapper around it using a common > interface. This sounds like a good idea. If the abstraction is good, it could lead us directly to the support of multiple accounts per protocol. A multiple account would than be just another instance of the particular account class. As centericq will deal with more abstract classes, it won't matter which class is underneath it. (I didn't look at the code dealing with this issue so far, so I don't know how much work it will be or what is possible) > - UI separation, so that we could plug any other > frontend to the centericq backend. Decoupling and more code modularity is always a good idea, but I agree with Tiger!P, this should be some kind of a low priority task. Cheers, Oliver _______________________________________________ Cicq mailing list Cicq-xGejAJT2w6wWP6gT/[email protected] http://mailman.linuxpl.org/mailman/listinfo/cicq Questions? Check the FAQ first: http://centericq.de/faq/