Re: Win32 Cygwin Binary
"Edward L. Haletky" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.everybuddy.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1051796727.10154.194.camel@constellation> |
Hi, A few corrections.... 1) Win32 does support dynamic linking. We used that on EB and AYTTM now. I can fix what Stuart has done given the source. Or just start fresh. 2) I am working on the GTK version, its just slow. ;) -Edward On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 08:24, Meredydd Luff wrote: > On Thursday 01 May 2003 13:45, Stuart Longland wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just managed to get the EB-Lite to compile on my machine under > > Cygwin (I was getting tired of Trillian) and so far, when I execute the > > core, I get the following: > > > > $ eb-lite > > Could not load registry: No such file or directory > > Could not open module /usr/share/eb-lite/plugins/msn.la (dlopen: Win32 > > error 126 > > ) > *snip* > That means it can't find the protocol modules, which isn't entirely > surprising given that Cygwin does not support dynamic linking (at least not > too readily). Try ./configure --with-static all to build all the modules > straight into the core. > > > Is there a native Win32 GUI floating about (I recall hearing that > > someone was working on one) or will I have to compile Qt under Cygwin > > (and perhaps use XFree86/Cygwin) to get it running? > There is no native Win32 UI yet. In fact, the Qt interface is currently the > only fully-featured one. Chris has succeeded in getting it to compile with > libx11, and I think has modified it so it should work straight-off now (if, > that is, you have Qt). Edward has mentioned that he intends to do a GTK one > sometime, which should have a windows version. Unfortunately, it's not going > to happen for a while. You could test the core by running a UI on a UNIX > machine and connecting it remotely, if you want. > > Ideally, of course, we would get either a properly-native Win32 UI (in VB or > C# or something) - either that or someone ponies up a few thousand for a > windows Qt licence :-P > > > I'm willing to distribute a binary tarball once I get this sucker going. > That would be much appreciated! > > Meredydd