Re: Re: DHT vs Gnutella
"Sam Berlin" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:09:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the insightful data about C & Java, Raphael. Sam On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Sam Berlin <[email protected]> from ml.gnutella.dev-forum: > :> gtk-gnutella and Phex can already carry the increased load as ultrapeers. > :> Can LimeWire carry it, too? > : > :How do you store leaf & intra-ultrapeer QRP, Arne? That's our primary > :barrier -- memory constraints. > > gtk-gnutella has no problems withstanding 50 ultrapeers and 300 leaves. > My ultranode uses about 250 MiB of memory under these settings. CPU > usage is ridiculously small, about 10% of a 2.8 GHz processor. > > But naturally gtk-gnutella is written in C and we have far better control > over memory than Java, for instance, which is a memory hog. > > Raphael > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >