Re: Re: DHT vs Gnutella

"Sam Berlin" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:09:12 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutella.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the insightful data about C & Java, Raphael.

Sam

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:07 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting Sam Berlin <[email protected]> from ml.gnutella.dev-forum:
> :> gtk-gnutella and Phex can already carry the increased load as ultrapeers.
> :> Can LimeWire carry it, too?
> :
> :How do you store leaf & intra-ultrapeer QRP, Arne?  That's our primary
> :barrier -- memory constraints.
>
> gtk-gnutella has no problems withstanding 50 ultrapeers and 300 leaves.
> My ultranode uses about 250 MiB of memory under these settings.  CPU
> usage is ridiculously small, about 10% of a 2.8 GHz processor.
>
> But naturally gtk-gnutella is written in C and we have far better control
> over memory than Java, for instance, which is a memory hog.
>
> Raphael
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>