Re: cookies.* vote results

Andy Smith wrote:

> Can the admin team now come up with a recommendation to the admin on
> where to go from here if he is still interested in being a part of
> Blitzed?
> 
> Possibilities that I see:
> 
> A) It is unlikely that this admin would be welcome regardless of
>    server details.
> 
> B) Admin should feel free to approach us immediately regarding
>    starting test link over again with the same server.  Note no new
>    link application or routing team involvement.
> 
> C) Admin should take 30 days to ensure his server is stable and
>    ready for another try, then approach us regarding starting over a
>    new test link with the same server. Note no new link application
>    or routing team involvement.
> 
> D) Standard delink policy should apply (wait at least 30 days,
>    approach routing team with new application).
> 
> If Fraggle has no interest in being part of Blitzed then it would be
> helpful if he could say so now so as to save us some debating time.
> 
> I am in favour of C, but should Fraggle ever return I hope he would
> make a real effort to be easier to work with and a failure to do
> that would end up in me again recommending against permlink when the
> vote was due.

Also in favour of C, as he did mention that some of the stability issues 
were caused by another server in the same rack and that he wanted to 
swap the box to another cabinet - this would change the IP address but 
not the rest of the aspects of the server.

I would like to see the alternative ping/traceroute results from the 
server if it was moved.