Re: Load testing with JRobin and Newts
"Seibold, Michael" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:50:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Fred, we observed those „holes“ in the graphs when by mistake the same system was defined in opennms more than once as a node. It’s quite a difficult task you are trying – there are a lot of possibilities to optimize throughput using rrd. File caching by operating system and a lot of memory, disk block size, disabling read-ahead, number of write processes, enabling MNIO (rrd-configuration.properties), … Just optimizing block size and read-ahead is a time consuming task – queued operations pending, completed updates, garbage collection, cpu usage, iowait, disk tps, disk io size, disk writes/reads, everything changes when you change the block size or read-ahead. So where or what is the optimum? You should read those pages: https://wiki.opennms.org/wiki/RRD_performance_fundamentals https://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool-trac/wiki/TuningRRD But it might be that the biggest advantage of using newts is to obtain good performance without the need to do a lot of performance tuning. I would be very interested to hear about your results. I tried newts a few years ago, when it was still not integrated in OpenNMS, but hadn’t the time since to set up a real testbed, so the server is still running rrd (or, to tell the truth, jrb). -Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-discuss mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-discuss