Re: Salvaging Unwire Portland
Russell Senior <[email protected]> 31 Jul 2007 13:37:52 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.portland.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael McGirr <[email protected]> writes: Michael> While in Portland I had a setup similar to this. I used an Michael> old pc loaded with debian and two nics plus two ap's. It Michael> worked perfectly in providing the two separate networks. Now Michael> if I recall correctly, and its been awhile, werent there a Michael> bunch of old pc's Tom was storing? Also, wouldn't funding Michael> some cheaper ap's be a good use of the budget? Just my 2 Michael> cents. Yeah, that works too. You'd need three nics, one for upstream, one for each of two access points, but that is relatively trivial, since these boxes are plentiful (we've got more than we are using and we can get more as needed from FreeGeek, I think). The downside of this kind of configuration is the maintenance burden that keeping them running on a massive scale would represent. Imagine 10% penetration, which would pencil out to about 250 PTP nodes per square mile. Also the size, noise and power requirements are suboptimal. As for funding cheaper AP's, that'll work on a small scale too, but our bank account, at least at the present time, is rather limited. -- Russell Senior, Secretary [email protected] -- The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette