Re: anti-spam filtering on this list? challenge responses?
Matt Westervelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] has been removed. We can probably all stop talking about this now ;) -matt Haudy Kazemi wrote: >It appears that this issue came up on the swn-talk list a few months ago, >also in regards to Stephan Verrips' autoresponder. At the time, Matt W was >not able to identify Stephan's subscribed email address so as to be able to >unsubscribe him. I checked the swn list archives and have found no posts >by Stephan on swn-talk or swn-dev. > >http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/thread.html#16893 >http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/016889.html >http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/016896.html > >Google found these addresses for a 'Stephan Verrips': >http://lists.nluug.nl/pipermail/wurlug/2004-July/000442.html stephan at >verrips.name >http://lists.nluug.nl/pipermail/wurlug/2005-July/001167.html stephan at >verrips.name >http://thebird.nl/wurlug/wiki.pl?MemberList stephan at >verrips dot com >Google Groups (old message from ~1999) >[email protected] >http://www.samspade.org/t/whois?a=verrips.com&server=magic >Matt W: can you check to see if any of these addresses is the one that was >subscribed to dev and talk? > >I have since created a mail filter to throw email from '[email protected]' >in my junk folder. I disagree with your statement 'Automated response is a >tool that people "with responsibilities" use to make sure that those >emailing them know they aren't being ignored.' and it appears others do >too when I look at the archives referenced above. In this case, Stephan is >the one being ignored, because his mail is going directly to the junk >folder of several list subscribers. Personally, I would feel ignored if I >emailed someone and then their email system answers me with a form letter >automatic response. > >There are better techniques than C/R systems. My main point of contention >is I did not send Stephan any email directly. The only email I sent went >to [email protected] and that mailing list server attempted to send a >message to Stephan. As I did not email Stephan myself, I do not expect an >autoreply from his account. Had I emailed him directly, I would be less >bothered by this autoreply. Autoreplies have no place on mailing lists and >neither list lurkers nor list posters should have to put up with >autoresponders. > >For those who don't like SpamBayes, look at PopFile >(http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), a different Bayes email filter. > >-hk > >At 05:32 PM 7/21/2005 -0700, Jason Morton wrote: > > >It only replies to the one person that sent it, not the whole list. >Automated response is a tool that people "with responsibilities" use to >make sure that those emailing them know they aren't being ignored. > >Here is a link that actually has something useful, not just eggheads >dreaming of a computer literate society... SpamBayes ><http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/>http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ .If >you don't like automated responses you can train it to send it to your junk >folder. This way you will never have the sorrow of dealing with 1 little >email. You won't even have to click delete! Fancy that! >If we were getting 200 "I'm not ins" then sure that's a problem. One email >is not a problem and the whole group shouldn't have to change because you >have enough time to complain! You can always remove yourself from the list, >that will solve it as well. > >Jason > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jason Self [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:02 PM >To: SeattleWireless Development List >Subject: Re: anti-spam filtering on this list? challenge responses? > > I agree. C/R system should NOT be used. The URLs you gave provide perfect >examples of why. > > For those unfortunate enough to have a C/R system thrust upon them by an >organization, I feel very sorry for them & agree that something should be >done with the system to prevent it from willy-nilly responding to each & >every person on a mailing list. > > >_______________________________________________ >Dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev