Re: anti-spam filtering on this list? challenge responses?

Matt Westervelt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] has been removed.

We can probably all stop talking about this now ;)

-matt


Haudy Kazemi wrote:

>It appears that this issue came up on the swn-talk list a few months ago,
>also in regards to Stephan Verrips' autoresponder.  At the time, Matt W was
>not able to identify Stephan's subscribed email address so as to be able to
>unsubscribe him.  I checked the swn list archives and have found no posts
>by Stephan on swn-talk or swn-dev.
>
>http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/thread.html#16893
>http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/016889.html
>http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/2005-March/016896.html
>
>Google found these addresses for a 'Stephan Verrips':
>http://lists.nluug.nl/pipermail/wurlug/2004-July/000442.html     stephan at
>verrips.name
>http://lists.nluug.nl/pipermail/wurlug/2005-July/001167.html     stephan at
>verrips.name
>http://thebird.nl/wurlug/wiki.pl?MemberList                      stephan at
>verrips dot com
>Google Groups (old message from ~1999)
>[email protected]
>http://www.samspade.org/t/whois?a=verrips.com&server=magic
>Matt W:  can you check to see if any of these addresses is the one that was
>subscribed to dev and talk?
>
>I have since created a mail filter to throw email from '[email protected]'
>in my junk folder.  I disagree with your statement 'Automated response is a
>tool that people "with responsibilities" use to make sure that those
>emailing them know they aren't being ignored.'  and it appears others do
>too when I look at the archives referenced above.  In this case, Stephan is
>the one being ignored, because his mail is going directly to the junk
>folder of several list subscribers.  Personally, I would feel ignored if I
>emailed someone and then their email system answers me with a form letter
>automatic response.
>
>There are better techniques than C/R systems.  My main point of contention
>is I did not send Stephan any email directly.  The only email I sent went
>to [email protected] and that mailing list server attempted to send a
>message to Stephan.  As I did not email Stephan myself, I do not expect an
>autoreply from his account.  Had I emailed him directly, I would be less
>bothered by this autoreply.  Autoreplies have no place on mailing lists and
>neither list lurkers nor list posters should have to put up with
>autoresponders.
>
>For those who don't like SpamBayes, look at PopFile
>(http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), a different Bayes email filter.
>
>-hk
>
>At 05:32 PM 7/21/2005 -0700, Jason Morton wrote: 
>  
>
>It only replies to the one person that sent it, not the whole list.
>Automated response is a tool that people "with responsibilities" use to
>make sure that those emailing them know they aren't being ignored. 
>  
>Here is a link that actually has something useful, not just eggheads
>dreaming of a computer literate society... SpamBayes
><http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/>http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ .If
>you don't like automated responses you can train it to send it to your junk
>folder. This way you will never have the sorrow of dealing with 1 little
>email. You won't even have to click delete! Fancy that! 
>If we were getting 200 "I'm not ins" then sure that's a problem. One email
>is not a problem and the whole group shouldn't have to change because you
>have enough time to complain! You can always remove yourself from the list,
>that will solve it as well. 
>  
>Jason
>  
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Self [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:02 PM
>To: SeattleWireless Development List
>Subject: Re: anti-spam filtering on this list? challenge responses?
>
> I agree. C/R system should NOT be used. The URLs you gave provide perfect
>examples of why.
>  
> For those unfortunate enough to have a C/R system thrust upon them by an
>organization, I feel very sorry for them & agree that something should be
>done with the system to prevent it from willy-nilly responding to each &
>every person on a mailing list. 
>  
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.