Re: Bluetooth version 1.2 specs from SIG

I thought about this after reading the article, should we take the changes into
consideration with our design?  I thought that perhaps it would be best not to.
Personally, I would like to see something working in the short term (getting a
design actually built and working for a demo).  Adding additional constraints
and conditions could be confusing, especially considering that most of us are
learning as we go along.  This is just my opinion however, and I'm certainly
open to other points of view. 
                                                      Mike

On  0, Jamil Khatib <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> I think we need to review our design document according to latest bluetooth
> standards both bluetooth SIG and IEEE.
> do you think we should make modification to support latest one?
> 
> Regards,
> Jamil 
> On 6/23/2003, "Mohamed Salem" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >Dear Friends,
> >That's a EE story that's worth reading about the progress and challenge
> >in the bluetooth development .
> >here it is :::::
> >=======================================
> >
> >--Bluetooth awaits its fate amidst rate debate--
> >In the midst of a critical industry debate over the future
> >evolution of the wireless technology, the Bluetooth Special Interest
> >Group presented details of its soon-to-be-ratified Version 1.2
> >specification at Bluetooth World Congress here.
> >http://newsletter.EDTN.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/eMX70FKzzF0tH0B2Zs0AF
> ># # # # # #
> >
> >
> >====================================
> >--
> >Mohamed A Salem
> >Handasa Arabia Organization

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nour-unsubscribe-bZJqt4gKw0dwc45b+y0WwMLKnirKmNT7@public.gmane.org
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Handasa Arabia, http://www.handasarabia.org