Re: meta question about learning Unix, PATH, HOME, and ~
"NM Public" <[email protected]> 27 Jun 2006 09:55:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.infiniteink |
|---|---|
| Organization | Infinite Ink |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rather than trying to respond to individual parts of your
interesting message, Beartooth, here are a few thoughts that I
had while reading it.
* Hanging out in Unix land is a great way to hone one's
analytical skills so I can easily appreciate why someone who was
attracted to mathematics & logic would also be attracted to Unix
(and not be attracted to MS operating systems (Apple is another
story for another thread)).
* Maybe in the future we will teach children "critical thinking"
or "analytical thinking" or "how to think" by teaching them
Unix. This might be in addition to, or instead of, some of the
mathematics that is currently taught to children. The advantage
of teaching Unix to children is that it is actually useful to
them *immediately*. I.e., because they can start playing with it
on a computer and making the computer do things with little Unix
scripts. (I wonder if anyone is doing Unix with children
already?)
* Learning and using Unix as an adult is a constant reminder to
your brain about the importance of thinking carefully and
precisely. I appreciate what you said about commands being
"lifeless," but I think it's important to balance the big bright
hot world of art [1] with the cold world of the command line.
It's important because it keeps your brain from turning to mush
and also because it helps you to perceive the
cold/precise/analytical aspects of art. Also note that the
command-line world is not completely cold and there is art that
emerges from it.
* I think you should definitely check out those Unix philosophy
books I mentioned in the "PATH, HOME, and ~" thread!
[1] By "art" I mean art/literature/etc.
--Nancy