Re[2]: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Adam Fathauer via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I worked at a Fortune 5 bank that implemented ipv6. We did it at our edge, internally and even with business partners (SBA). YOU might not be familiar with businesses that are not using it - that doesn’t mean no one is. Adam ------ Original Message ------ From "Shane Ronan via NANOG" <[email protected]> To "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]> Cc "Jamie Thain" <[email protected]>; "Shane Ronan" <[email protected]> Date 5/4/2026 18:58:16 Subject Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF >You must not deal with very many corporations because I know many that have >added v6 to their corporate networks. Think of many in the top 200 >companies in the US. > >Shane > >On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 6:28 PM Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Kevin, >> >> I can't fix ipv6 I'll leave that to people that understand the basics. >> >> No one, and i mean no one in corp (that's not a super scalar) knows >> anything about ipv6 and no one and i mean no one cares. >> >> They know it's on in there os and there's some mystery that some things >> will break if it's off. >> >> Jamie >> >> On Mon., May 4, 2026, 2:27 p.m. Kevin Tillery via NANOG, < >>[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Jamie >> > >> > And ipv8 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv6. >> > >> > I appreciate your input. >> > >> > Kevin >> > >> > >> > On 4 May 2026 08:26:33 CEST, Jamie Thain via NANOG < >>[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >Marco >> > > >> > >And ipv6 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv4. >> > > >> > >I appreciate your input. >> > > >> > >Jamie >> > > >> > >On Sun., May 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. Marco Moock via NANOG, < >> > >[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: >> > >> > >> > >> > * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled >> the >> > >> > address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery, >> > >> > autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling. >> > >> >> > >> That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare >> > >> and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how >> it >> > >> is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP. >> It >> > >> is there and works. >> > >> >> > >> Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that >> needs >> > >> to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented. >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Gruß >> > >> Marco >> > >> >> > >> Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> NANOG mailing list >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/ >> > >_______________________________________________ >> > >NANOG mailing list >> > > >> > >>https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AVIU5UM7TNRP7DARNQCQXX6EVBJRANVR/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > NANOG mailing list >> > >> > >>https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MPYN6YGEZCGL5ZH6Z4BLZMUWBEU3SXEV/ >> _______________________________________________ >> NANOG mailing list >> >>https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SGDZ4RYZSMBWEGOG36DHRV5W3O465YWK/ >_______________________________________________ >NANOG mailing list >https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ABKATN6CSOA55JOI326QUM4XUY5NLQUK/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6MJ4UMRS6KHDPZKHURAFLICHAVRJBCQE/