RE: RE: [REPForum] REPforum get-together
"William F. Maton" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:26:19 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Hrybyk, Michael wrote: > One way to have the majors participate is to have the users demand it as part of an RFP. The univs did this, and chose the winning providers based, in part, on their commitment to participate in the local exchange. Sometimes the consumer can have an > effect on the producer. > > I'm not saying the majors are *excited* about participating, btw. The > battle is far from over. Indeed, that has been the basis of much discussion at OttIX (Ottawa Internet Exchange in Ottawa, Canada - www.ottix.net). There had been debate about pulling in the majors somehow, but the discussion is always centred on questions like: "Why would they?" "What's the business case for them?" "We're too small!" Some of the thinking has been going the same way as Mike already said: RFP's issued with the caveat that the bandwidth would be accessed via OttIX, and that the winning bidder would have to deal with that. So there are different ways to grow city or regional exchanges, and the above is one way. wfms