RE: RE: GIMP 2.0
Richard Ford <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:01:15 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing.tech |
|---|---|
| Organization | Creditude |
| Message-ID | <1080720075.6694.166.camel__3924.04770614139$1080720100@localhost.localdomain> |
This is my need as well. For digi shots - to sometimes a quick crop/rotate/resize/etc sort of stuff. GIMP is too complex - layers - jeez - don't want to go down that path. My needs are mainly for small things - so I don't have to go through the process of using the graphics dept at work - which while good in results, is not good for my productivity at times. I want it done NOW. I am sick of having to use win32 software..... I have digi cams connection working fine in linux. But now I need to find a replacement for all the free simple software that came with my camera. I wish we could get MacOSX apps to work in linux, like they can get linux apps to work in MacOSX. As most digi cams come with mac and windows software.... :-( RF. On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:44, Frederic Muller wrote: > Seems I never got that thread. Was also wondering about Gimp 2. > I remember Graham had some comments about Gimp 1.2 because of the lack of > layer support. This has been added in version 2. > > More generally I was wondering if anyone had experience with digital > photography on a Linux desktop and how to import RAW files from different > manufacturers (NEF I am interested in, but all is of interest) and Linux > applications you use for retouching and photo database management (I use > iMatch 3.4 which is only available for Windows). Is there any good > equivalent on Linux? what is your experience? > > Thanks > > Fred > > -----Original Message----- > From: blug-tech-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > [mailto:blug-tech-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ford > Sent: Wednesday 31 March, 2004 15:27 > To: Simon Cousins > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [blug-tech] RE: GIMP 2.0 > > > I meant to type: > > "too hard to use" > > Not: > > "to hard to use" > > Migraine on, computer off. > > I shall rest my digital impulses for a few days. ;-) > > RF. > > > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:15, Simon Cousins wrote: > > Peach wrote: > > > > > Has anyone yet experience GIMP 2.0 - or can offer some advice on > > > other image editing programs that are easy to use? I mean easy like > > > in MS Paint - but maybe a little more sophisticated? > > > > Wish I could comment, but like you I find Photoshop and the (old) GIMP > > to be unfathomable. I'd love to boost a FOSS graphics solution (and > > will look at > > GIMP2) but for the last few months I've been doing most of my graphics > stuff > > in Photoshop Elements, a kind-of Photoshop For Dummies. I run it in a > > Windows XP VMware session on Chaoyangnux, my main Linux box at home. It's > > pretty cool in that it features lots of "recipes" (or macros) to achieve > > commonly needed outcomes (red-eye reduction, masking, and so on). > > > > /src > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > blug-tech list > [email protected] > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-tech > > > _______________________________________________ > blug-tech list > [email protected] > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-tech