Router Modem Recommendation?
Perry Spiller <[email protected]> Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:06:45 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.hawkes-bay |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In recent weeks, I seem to have been beset with all sorts of ADSL problems. Still trying to resolve them, but my patience is sorely tried. Rather than persist with ISP-supplied 'free' items, I wonder if it's more appropriate to buy what's best for the set- up that I have? I'm using a D-Link DIR-300 WAP in the office, as a LAN switch and an Internet WAP. That causes problems. Present setup Router modem > IPCOP server > two wired LANs. (Forget LAN 2 as it's irrelevant to the present matter) LAN 1 goes through a switch, to 2 x PCs and the DIR-300, which in its turn, connects to a network printer and another PC. There's a laptop around that uses the WAP. All are on static IPs. The 'rub' with the DIR-300 is that it's necessary to move the ethernet cable from the port marked 'Internet' to a port marked LAN, for the PC's on the switch or 'near' side of the DIR-300 to be able to be 'see' and/or access the network printer, or other PC, on the 'far' side of the DIR-300. i.e. Either the LAN works or the WAP works, but not both, at once. I understand there is a configurable workaround in the DIR-300, to remedy that dilemma. I'm trying to keep an open-mind on options, now. What-if I could get a grunty wireless router modem to put in front of the IPCOP box? That could provide wifi and the DIR-300 could be left working as a switch. The IPCOP box and present router modem are out in the garage, so a weak wifi signal would be 'unhelpful.' So, if you've followed me thus far, what sort of beast might you recommend, if the above scenario seemed like a good one? Or suggest a better 'layout plan,' instead, perhaps? _______________________________________________ HBLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hblug