Re: Chicagoland ISP suggestions?
Mike Cathey <[email protected]> 28 Jul 2002 18:04:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1027893895.2852.64.camel@localhost> |
Vitaly, I appreciate the quick reply! On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 17:04, Vitaly McLain wrote: > If you're looking for broadband, I would say AT&T's cable modem offerings > are pretty good -- unless you want to host a server. I planned on hosting my own domain (http/smtp), but it gets very few hits. On my current cable connection I really notice when CodeRed/Nimda infected hosts are hitting apache and I have 2-4 ssh sessions open. Because of this, I'm really looking for something with more than 128k upstream. I'll be telecommuting full time so the home connection will be pretty important. > > I've dealt with numerous DSL companies and if you want to go that direction, > stay away from anyone that deals with Ameritech. Hosting.com/InterAccess, > for example, is an example of ISP that gives you good speed/reliability > simply because they don't have to deal with Ameritech too much. (Note: > InterAccess will give you an IP that points towards their firewall unless > you pay more for their static IP.) Thanks for the input on Ameritech. I checked out dslreports.com, but almost all of the ISPs had at least some negative feedback and I really don't want to give Earthlink any of my money. My employer will be subsidizing my net connection, so I'll probably go for a static. It would definitely make DNS less of a hassle. > AirLogic.net is a very, very interesting offering if you are in their area > of coverage. AFIAK I'll be in the 6061[46] area code (~IIT for my wife's MS in CS). I think I'll be ~40 miles south of their serving area according to the map on their site. > As for dial-up, I am not sure, since I haven't used dial-up for quite some > time. Netcom/Mindspring was good until Earthlink bought them out. They > started going down hill, although the service was still pretty decent. Thanks, Mike