Re: you guys' work promotes my mental health

Oh, I see ! You're from the “Common Law v Maritime Law,” “Free Man on 
the Land” [1] bunch. I've enjoyed this conspiracy theory a lot, in 
France we had the “je ne contracte pas” [2] stemming from it just last 
year. But French law stems from Napoleonic Civil Code, i.e. continental 
law, which is ; little to do with Common Law... Anyways.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_movement
[2] https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhlKiWRqkB9

In the end, I believe this all stems from the misplaced free association 
thought (or misplaced “right brain” more or less). As somebody else 
says, “I stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Libertarianism when I 
realized it is but yet another neuroatypy.”

Enjoy

On 2025-03-28 14:58, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
> The shrinks got too litigious, and "mental health" is practiced as a
> branch of "law" alongside "intellectual property" and other matters
> that are either "imaginary" or "all in your head" ...
> 
> There are laws against "simulating legal process" over such imaginary
> matters etc.
> <https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-11/chapter-56/article-4/section-11-56-620/>
> but such laws are never enforced, because even without a Constitution
> the law itself can't be illegal in a court of law, and even if it
> were, the attorneys can't prosecute themselves or else they'd put
> themselves out of business for their own practices.
> 
> The "law" itself by definition being whatever "lawyers" keep
> themselves in business practicing and billing for. Unless you think
> you can be successful in court as yet another crackpot mentally ill
> "pro se" petitioner with a flat tire or another speeding ticket or
> traffic violation on the way to court you must answer, with paying off
> all your parking tickets and getting your vehicle released from city
> hall impound after court, but your own petitions are just going to be
> professionally dismissed for failure to appear at any one of those
> numerous perfunctory court hearings for filing a suit. Cops have
> grappling hooks and shoot-out axle nets to physically disable and stop
> your vehicle on the road now. That's why the real pro lawyers always
> hail a cab or take Uber or Lyft to court because you can't even
> consider driving or parking your own vehicle in a hostile red-light
> district.
> 
> On March 28, 2025 2:48:29 AM PDT, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-03-28 07:01, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
>> 
>> On Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:51:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time izzy
>> Meyer wrote:
>> 
>> Curious why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that
>> they
>> made themselves vulnerable about. Sure- you have your views on
>> things,
>> and that's totally cool. But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of
>> someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time?
>> 
>> People serve process with mental health allegations that sticks
>> worse than a
>> felony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they
>> want others
>> to be forgiving of them?
> 
> Oh ! I think I get you. I had the impression that you were sympathetic
> to
> antipsychiatry, especially given the related posts on your blog. I'm
> still
> not very sure but ... I've never been charged for anything criminal or
> against
> the law, you're making quite a broad generalization here.
> When talking about mental illness and the aforementioned soothing I
> get from
> obsd and suckless, I was alluding to the relative cognitive overload
> undeliberately enforced by other projects which seems mostly absent
> from these
> two – as hinted at in the title of my page UNIX.html @saboua.xyz
> 
>> Mental health services, like those of astrologers or magicians,
>> psychics,
>> tarot card readers, palmists, have gained far too much of a sheen of
>> legitimacy (or color of law, as it were) in court for service of
>> process and
>> summons to appear -- Say does a person really have an organic
>> "mental illness"
>> of known etiology? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process
>> with a
>> catch-all diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a
>> court of law
>> for some other legal summons?
> 
> That's right. A lot of diagnoses are abusive, esp. when considering
> the prevalent
> traumatic liminal state that pervades among our relatives within
> society. But as
> for me I attribute this to Big Pharma's lucrative motive, not legal
> summons which
> I've seen cases of while at the ward.
> 
>> Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because it's
>> the law.
> 
> Precisely. Legal is not necessarily moral.
> 
> Sylvain Saboua

-- 
Sylvain Saboua