Re: you guys' work promotes my mental health
justina colmena ~biz <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:54:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.advocacy,gmane.comp.misc.suckless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------BU3E9XEXVAI1E8SRNRL1V9ZTTIK0LG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Freemen on the land also advocate schemes to avoid taxes" Such as voting down the said taxes=2E Unless there is some other scheme in= place to tax people against their collective will=2E "Je ne contracte pas" =E2=80=94 so whatever it was I didn't agree to it=2E= Somebody else's agreement=2E What about all those shrink wrap license agre= ements on commercial software offerings? After you've paid for them and can= no longer get your money back by returning the item you paid for=2E =E2=80=9CI stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Libertarianism when I r= ealized it is but yet another neuroatypy=2E=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94 There's got = to be a good reason for enacting and enforcing some kind of "law" other tha= n just a bunch of petty rules to punish people just for the sake of punishi= ng them=2E For example, a lot of people are too lazy to mow their own lawns, but then= they go to court with service of process and summons to appear to force th= eir neighbors to mow their lawns to their expectations=2E In which case I s= uppose a blade of grass a fraction of an inch too long that tickles your ba= re foot is a prime example of "neuroatypy" unless it's actually against the= law to go barefoot on your own lawn in neighborhoods like that=2E On March 28, 2025 9:59:34 AM PDT, Sylvain Saboua <sylvain@saboua=2Eme> wro= te: >Oh, I see ! You're from the =E2=80=9CCommon Law v Maritime Law,=E2=80=9D = =E2=80=9CFree Man on the Land=E2=80=9D [1] bunch=2E I've enjoyed this consp= iracy theory a lot, in France we had the =E2=80=9Cje ne contracte pas=E2=80= =9D [2] stemming from it just last year=2E But French law stems from Napole= onic Civil Code, i=2Ee=2E continental law, which is ; little to do with Com= mon Law=2E=2E=2E Anyways=2E > >[1] https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_movement >[2] https://www=2Eyoutube=2Ecom/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhlKiWRqkB9 > >In the end, I believe this all stems from the misplaced free association = thought (or misplaced =E2=80=9Cright brain=E2=80=9D more or less)=2E As som= ebody else says, =E2=80=9CI stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Liberta= rianism when I realized it is but yet another neuroatypy=2E=E2=80=9D > >Enjoy > >On 2025-03-28 14:58, justina colmena ~biz wrote: >> The shrinks got too litigious, and "mental health" is practiced as a >> branch of "law" alongside "intellectual property" and other matters >> that are either "imaginary" or "all in your head" =2E=2E=2E >>=20 >> There are laws against "simulating legal process" over such imaginary >> matters etc=2E >> <https://law=2Ejustia=2Ecom/codes/alaska/title-11/chapter-56/article-4/= section-11-56-620/> >> but such laws are never enforced, because even without a Constitution >> the law itself can't be illegal in a court of law, and even if it >> were, the attorneys can't prosecute themselves or else they'd put >> themselves out of business for their own practices=2E >>=20 >> The "law" itself by definition being whatever "lawyers" keep >> themselves in business practicing and billing for=2E Unless you think >> you can be successful in court as yet another crackpot mentally ill >> "pro se" petitioner with a flat tire or another speeding ticket or >> traffic violation on the way to court you must answer, with paying off >> all your parking tickets and getting your vehicle released from city >> hall impound after court, but your own petitions are just going to be >> professionally dismissed for failure to appear at any one of those >> numerous perfunctory court hearings for filing a suit=2E Cops have >> grappling hooks and shoot-out axle nets to physically disable and stop >> your vehicle on the road now=2E That's why the real pro lawyers always >> hail a cab or take Uber or Lyft to court because you can't even >> consider driving or parking your own vehicle in a hostile red-light >> district=2E >>=20 >> On March 28, 2025 2:48:29 AM PDT, sylvain@saboua=2Eme wrote: >>=20 >>> On 2025-03-28 07:01, justina colmena ~biz wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:51:35=E2=80=AFAM Pacific Daylight Time i= zzy >>> Meyer wrote: >>>=20 >>> Curious why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that >>> they >>> made themselves vulnerable about=2E Sure- you have your views on >>> things, >>> and that's totally cool=2E But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of >>> someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time? >>>=20 >>> People serve process with mental health allegations that sticks >>> worse than a >>> felony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they >>> want others >>> to be forgiving of them? >>=20 >> Oh ! I think I get you=2E I had the impression that you were sympatheti= c >> to >> antipsychiatry, especially given the related posts on your blog=2E I'm >> still >> not very sure but =2E=2E=2E I've never been charged for anything crimin= al or >> against >> the law, you're making quite a broad generalization here=2E >> When talking about mental illness and the aforementioned soothing I >> get from >> obsd and suckless, I was alluding to the relative cognitive overload >> undeliberately enforced by other projects which seems mostly absent >> from these >> two =E2=80=93 as hinted at in the title of my page UNIX=2Ehtml @saboua= =2Exyz >>=20 >>> Mental health services, like those of astrologers or magicians, >>> psychics, >>> tarot card readers, palmists, have gained far too much of a sheen of >>> legitimacy (or color of law, as it were) in court for service of >>> process and >>> summons to appear -- Say does a person really have an organic >>> "mental illness" >>> of known etiology? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process >>> with a >>> catch-all diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a >>> court of law >>> for some other legal summons? >>=20 >> That's right=2E A lot of diagnoses are abusive, esp=2E when considering >> the prevalent >> traumatic liminal state that pervades among our relatives within >> society=2E But as >> for me I attribute this to Big Pharma's lucrative motive, not legal >> summons which >> I've seen cases of while at the ward=2E >>=20 >>> Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because it's >>> the law=2E >>=20 >> Precisely=2E Legal is not necessarily moral=2E >>=20 >> Sylvain Saboua > >--=20 >Sylvain Saboua ------BU3E9XEXVAI1E8SRNRL1V9ZTTIK0LG Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body><div dir=3D"auto">"Freemen on the land also advoca= te schemes to avoid taxes"<br><br>Such as voting down the said taxes=2E Unl= ess there is some other scheme in place to tax people against their collect= ive will=2E<br><br>"Je ne contracte pas" =E2=80=94 so whatever it was I did= n't agree to it=2E Somebody else's agreement=2E What about all those shrink= wrap license agreements on commercial software offerings? After you've pai= d for them and can no longer get your money back by returning the item you = paid for=2E<br><br>=E2=80=9CI stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Liber= tarianism when I realized it is but yet another neuroatypy=2E=E2=80=9D =E2= =80=94 There's got to be a good reason for enacting and enforcing some kind= of "law" other than just a bunch of petty rules to punish people just for = the sake of punishing them=2E<br><br>For example, a lot of people are too l= azy to mow their own lawns, but then they go to court with service of proce= ss and summons to appear to force their neighbors to mow their lawns to the= ir expectations=2E In which case I suppose a blade of grass a fraction of a= n inch too long that tickles your bare foot is a prime example of "neuroaty= py" unless it's actually against the law to go barefoot on your own lawn in= neighborhoods like that=2E</div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div di= r=3D"auto">On March 28, 2025 9:59:34 AM PDT, Sylvain Saboua <sylvain@sab= oua=2Eme> wrote:</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:= 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-le= ft: 1ex;"> <pre class=3D"k9mail"><div dir=3D"auto">Oh, I see ! You're from the =E2=80= =9CCommon Law v Maritime Law,=E2=80=9D =E2=80=9CFree Man on the Land=E2=80= =9D [1] bunch=2E I've enjoyed this conspiracy theory a lot, in France we ha= d the =E2=80=9Cje ne contracte pas=E2=80=9D [2] stemming from it just last = year=2E But French law stems from Napoleonic Civil Code, i=2Ee=2E continent= al law, which is ; little to do with Common Law=2E=2E=2E Anyways=2E<br><br>= [1] <a href=3D"https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_moveme= nt">https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_movement</a><br>[= 2] <a href=3D"https://www=2Eyoutube=2Ecom/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhl= KiWRqkB9">https://www=2Eyoutube=2Ecom/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhlKiWR= qkB9</a><br><br>In the end, I believe this all stems from the misplaced fre= e association thought (or misplaced =E2=80=9Cright brain=E2=80=9D more or l= ess)=2E As somebody else says, =E2=80=9CI stopped nurturing any interest in= Ancap/Libertarianism when I realized it is but yet another neuroatypy=2E= =E2=80=9D<br><br>Enjoy<br><br>On 2025-03-28 14:58, justina colmena ~biz wro= te:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex= 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"a= uto">The shrinks got too litigious, and "mental health" is practiced as a<b= r>branch of "law" alongside "intellectual property" and other matters<br>th= at are either "imaginary" or "all in your head" =2E=2E=2E<br><br>There are = laws against "simulating legal process" over such imaginary<br>matters etc= =2E<br><<a href=3D"https://law=2Ejustia=2Ecom/codes/alaska/title-11/chap= ter-56/article-4/section-11-56-620/">https://law=2Ejustia=2Ecom/codes/alask= a/title-11/chapter-56/article-4/section-11-56-620/</a>><br>but such laws= are never enforced, because even without a Constitution<br>the law itself = can't be illegal in a court of law, and even if it<br>were, the attorneys c= an't prosecute themselves or else they'd put<br>themselves out of business = for their own practices=2E<br><br>The "law" itself by definition being what= ever "lawyers" keep<br>themselves in business practicing and billing for=2E= Unless you think<br>you can be successful in court as yet another crackpot= mentally ill<br>"pro se" petitioner with a flat tire or another speeding t= icket or<br>traffic violation on the way to court you must answer, with pay= ing off<br>all your parking tickets and getting your vehicle released from = city<br>hall impound after court, but your own petitions are just going to = be<br>professionally dismissed for failure to appear at any one of those<br= >numerous perfunctory court hearings for filing a suit=2E Cops have<br>grap= pling hooks and shoot-out axle nets to physically disable and stop<br>your = vehicle on the road now=2E That's why the real pro lawyers always<br>hail a= cab or take Uber or Lyft to court because you can't even<br>consider drivi= ng or parking your own vehicle in a hostile red-light<br>district=2E<br><br= >On March 28, 2025 2:48:29 AM PDT, sylvain@saboua=2Eme wrote:<br><br></div>= <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; bor= der-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"auto">On 2025-= 03-28 07:01, justina colmena ~biz wrote:<br><br>On Thursday, March 27, 2025= 8:51:35=E2=80=AFAM Pacific Daylight Time izzy<br>Meyer wrote:<br><br>Curio= us why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that<br>they<br>mad= e themselves vulnerable about=2E Sure- you have your views on<br>things,<br= >and that's totally cool=2E But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of<br>= someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time?<br><br>People ser= ve process with mental health allegations that sticks<br>worse than a<br>fe= lony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they<br>want othe= rs<br>to be forgiving of them?<br></div></blockquote><div dir=3D"auto"><br>= Oh ! I think I get you=2E I had the impression that you were sympathetic<br= >to<br>antipsychiatry, especially given the related posts on your blog=2E I= 'm<br>still<br>not very sure but =2E=2E=2E I've never been charged for anyt= hing criminal or<br>against<br>the law, you're making quite a broad general= ization here=2E<br>When talking about mental illness and the aforementioned= soothing I<br>get from<br>obsd and suckless, I was alluding to the relativ= e cognitive overload<br>undeliberately enforced by other projects which see= ms mostly absent<br>from these<br>two =E2=80=93 as hinted at in the title o= f my page UNIX=2Ehtml @saboua=2Exyz<br><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail= _quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa= 8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"auto">Mental health services, like those= of astrologers or magicians,<br>psychics,<br>tarot card readers, palmists,= have gained far too much of a sheen of<br>legitimacy (or color of law, as = it were) in court for service of<br>process and<br>summons to appear -- Say= does a person really have an organic<br>"mental illness"<br>of known etiol= ogy? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process<br>with a<br>catch-a= ll diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a<br>court of law<br= >for some other legal summons?<br></div></blockquote><div dir=3D"auto"><br>= That's right=2E A lot of diagnoses are abusive, esp=2E when considering<br>= the prevalent<br>traumatic liminal state that pervades among our relatives = within<br>society=2E But as<br>for me I attribute this to Big Pharma's lucr= ative motive, not legal<br>summons which<br>I've seen cases of while at the= ward=2E<br><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0p= t 0pt 1ex 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div= dir=3D"auto">Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because = it's<br>the law=2E<br></div></blockquote><div dir=3D"auto"><br>Precisely=2E= Legal is not necessarily moral=2E<br><br>Sylvain Saboua<br></div></blockqu= ote><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></pre></blockquote></div></body></html> ------BU3E9XEXVAI1E8SRNRL1V9ZTTIK0LG--