Re: supported systems list
Martin Reindl <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:19:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.mac68k |
|---|---|
| Organization | catai.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nick Holland <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > > And i wonder why the 840AV was removed from the list of supported > > machines, and even more what's not working there. Additionally, the > > Quadra 800 and the AWS 80 are just the same hardware and it doesn't > > matter for OpenBSD what software Apple shipped with them. So the > > addition of the"WGS" part to mac68k.html doesn't make much sense to > > me. > > Apple was fond of slapping different labels on the same machine. > While TECHINCALLY there may be no reason to list them separately, when > you are rummaging around at a hardware swap or local trash dump (or my > basement), you don't necessarily have a cross-reference available > (though my basement has full net access. 8). I see, and you always have a printout of mac68k.html with you :) > The 840AV machine's on-board NIC is non-functional. A NuBus NIC on > the expansion bus is non-functional (same card is running very nicely > in my Q650). I tend to think an OpenBSD computer without usable > network support is pretty useless. This is an issue for all the > laptop Mac68k systems, too... I have trouble calling these anything > nicer than "support challenged", though maybe I'm a little harsh. > (please refrain from telling me it *could* be done using the serial > ports unless you do it and accomplish something that way) I asked because Xavier just removed it from the list of supported machines. It would make sense to list the 840AV in the partially supported machines section then. > The AV machines have some serious facination for me -- supposedly, > they were able to capture full motion video, which is impressive for a > 25MHz or 40MHz processor. And considering the disk and network > performance I've seen out of the supported mac68k systems, even > assuming the video capture was done purely in HW, I can't imagine my > Q650 just moving data around that fast, much less doing something with > it, as well. Yea, i read Apple built them with special DSPs for the video handling. > > Last but not least, i'm curious how a Quadra 700 behaves with 3.5 (I > > don't own a 700, i'm just curious). > > We are curious how EVERYTHING works. 8) And i try to find more mac68k hardware in this city, especially something with a 68030 ... > Nick. > -- > http://www.holland-consulting.net > Regards, Martin