Re: Profit and Value, was: Re(2): [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion

Diego Saravia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.oekonux.english
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
2009/5/7 marc fawzi <[email protected]>

> <<
> Its impossible to have an economic system at all (nor life) in
> thermodynamic
> equilibrium
> >>
>
> I think everyone is talking about demand supply equilibrium not
> thermodynamic equilibrium!!!


not everyone, as I see



>
>   Maybe it's easy to confuse if one is
> talking about thermoeconomics but you're stating the obvious here in
> saying there is NO EXCHANGE, NO MOVEMENT, NO LIFE when the economy is
> in a thermodynamic equilibrium, i.e. NO FLOW = NO LIFE, so I agree but
> believe everyone is talking about demand-supply


a stationary system (I use the word stable, but is  better stationary)


>
> But you can have demand-supply equilibrium for abundant goods/services
> if everyone who wants to have a given good/service can have it at cost
> (+ fixed profit margin so that there is not only sustainability but
> also possibility, assuming profit is spent exploring new inventions
> etc)



you only need profit if you want exploitation (in a stationary system),
that's "fist marxian theorem"

if you explore inventions, or if you accumulate capital, or if your
population grows, you are not in a stationary system (equilibrium in
economic language)





-- 
Diego Saravia
[email protected]
NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]


[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.