Re: Profit and Value, was: Re(2): [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
Diego Saravia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] 2009/5/7 marc fawzi <[email protected]> > << > Its impossible to have an economic system at all (nor life) in > thermodynamic > equilibrium > >> > > I think everyone is talking about demand supply equilibrium not > thermodynamic equilibrium!!! not everyone, as I see > > Maybe it's easy to confuse if one is > talking about thermoeconomics but you're stating the obvious here in > saying there is NO EXCHANGE, NO MOVEMENT, NO LIFE when the economy is > in a thermodynamic equilibrium, i.e. NO FLOW = NO LIFE, so I agree but > believe everyone is talking about demand-supply a stationary system (I use the word stable, but is better stationary) > > But you can have demand-supply equilibrium for abundant goods/services > if everyone who wants to have a given good/service can have it at cost > (+ fixed profit margin so that there is not only sustainability but > also possibility, assuming profit is spent exploring new inventions > etc) you only need profit if you want exploitation (in a stationary system), that's "fist marxian theorem" if you explore inventions, or if you accumulate capital, or if your population grows, you are not in a stationary system (equilibrium in economic language) -- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected] [2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]