Re: Accident Stats - the US Difference

"j.a. tackett" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.recreation.bicycle.touring.phred
Message-ID <[email protected]>
i have lived in the Appalachians of Virginia....it is a place unto its
own...and poverty brings along with it ...its brother of trash, filth,
sickness, .....just another world that is what i experienced

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Keith Ley <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:12:17 +0100
> > From: Nathan Wajsman <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: Bicycle Accident Stats
> > To: touring <[email protected]>
> > Message-ID: <243382BA-A1CB-4617-B13E-E8BCE7922F04-+cDRpMZVDdI@public.gmane.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > That's the key. When I was taking my driving lessons in Denmark back in
> 1978, one of the things that were drilled into our heads was to look over
> the right shoulder before turning right, to make sure there was no cyclist
> in the blind angle. This became such a habit that even when I lived in Tampa
> in the late 80s, when NOBODY cycled there, I still looked over my shoulder
> before turning right.
> >
> > Some Dutch towns are experimenting with a new and radical approach: they
> have gotten rid of traffic lights, zebra stripes, bike paths etc. Everyone
> is simply expected to share the road. Guess what? In many of those towns
> accidents went DOWN. In fairness, these tend to be smaller towns, we are not
> talking Amsterdam or Utrecht or Rotterdam here.
> >
> >
> > Nathan Wajsman
> > [email protected]
> >
> > Alicante, Spain
> > http://www.frozenlight.eu
> > http://www.greatpix.eu
> > http://www.nathanfoto.com
> > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> >
> > YNWA
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, David Whitmon wrote:
> >
> > > The thing about the Netherlands is that motorists know how to drive,
> are far better trained to drive with the idea that there are other road
> users who have the right of way.
> > >
> >
>
>
> I would believe this. During my TransAm last summer I rode for about 3
> weeks with two guys from the Netherlands. They often commented on both the
> poor driving skills and poor condition of many of the cars in the US. As we
> rode through the Appalachians one my favorite lines - " I don't understand
> every other store we pass sells car parts but all the cars are pieces of
> junk."
>
> I think what you said here illustrates why the "stats" discussed recently
> appear confusing or conflicting. We have a problem one symptom of which is
> cyclists getting into accidents with automobiles. We're treating this
> symptom by adding bike lanes, creating separate bike-ways, painting
> right-of-ways, lane dieting, etc. There is something to be said for this.
> However, at some point unless you are just riding a recreational bike path
> you will need to cross busy intersections and ride on streets that don't
> have protected bike lanes. The separate bicycling infrastructure reinforces
> the idea that bikes have thier own place and I (as a car driver) don't have
> to worry about them- a sort of "out of sight out of mind".  If the same
> lanes, signage, signals, etc. were both universally adopted and consistently
> implemented across the country (or even just from city to city in the same
> states) it would have a very positive impact. Rigth now I suspect that areas
> with well conceieved and con
>  structed cycling infrastructure are safer than areas that don't have this
> but places that have only partially implemented this stuff (some streets
> have bike lanes, many don't or the lanes come and go, or some areas of town
> are much more bicycle friendly than others) have done little to increase
> cycling safety.
>
> The real problem in the US is that drivers neither expect or respect
> cyclist on the roads.      Your statement "one of the things that were
> drilled into our heads was to look over the right shoulder before turning
> right, to make sure there was no cyclist in the blind angle" explains the
> difference. You were trained to EXPECT cyclists on the road and in doing
> this the country (in making sure you were trained) was showing a certain
> RESPECT for cyclists. The mind set in most of the US is that roads are for
> cars and bicycles have no business being on them.
>
> The real issue is the lack of consideration by motorists which we are doing
> little to change- especially when you see cases like that farce a few months
> back in Aspen were the big-money Mercedes driving banker pretty much ran
> over a cyclist and got off with nothing but a slap on the wrist. I don't
> expect this to change in the US. Eventually (many years from now) cycling
> will become safer in America not because American drivers will become more
> skilled, aware, or considerate but because automobiles will become
> "smarter". The technology and imaging systems now being installed on very
> high-end cars will improve and eventually trickle down. The drivers will
> still be distracted and stupid enough to run down cyclists and pedestrians
> but hopefully the cars will be too smart to let them do it in most cases.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Touring mailing list
> [email protected]
> Browse and search the archives: http://search.bikelist.org
> Unsubscribe or list settings:
> http://www.phred.org/mailman/options/touring
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.