Re: Accident Stats - the US Difference
"j.a. tackett" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.recreation.bicycle.touring.phred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
i have lived in the Appalachians of Virginia....it is a place unto its own...and poverty brings along with it ...its brother of trash, filth, sickness, .....just another world that is what i experienced On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Keith Ley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:12:17 +0100 > > From: Nathan Wajsman <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Bicycle Accident Stats > > To: touring <[email protected]> > > Message-ID: <243382BA-A1CB-4617-B13E-E8BCE7922F04-+cDRpMZVDdI@public.gmane.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > That's the key. When I was taking my driving lessons in Denmark back in > 1978, one of the things that were drilled into our heads was to look over > the right shoulder before turning right, to make sure there was no cyclist > in the blind angle. This became such a habit that even when I lived in Tampa > in the late 80s, when NOBODY cycled there, I still looked over my shoulder > before turning right. > > > > Some Dutch towns are experimenting with a new and radical approach: they > have gotten rid of traffic lights, zebra stripes, bike paths etc. Everyone > is simply expected to share the road. Guess what? In many of those towns > accidents went DOWN. In fairness, these tend to be smaller towns, we are not > talking Amsterdam or Utrecht or Rotterdam here. > > > > > > Nathan Wajsman > > [email protected] > > > > Alicante, Spain > > http://www.frozenlight.eu > > http://www.greatpix.eu > > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > YNWA > > > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, David Whitmon wrote: > > > > > The thing about the Netherlands is that motorists know how to drive, > are far better trained to drive with the idea that there are other road > users who have the right of way. > > > > > > > > I would believe this. During my TransAm last summer I rode for about 3 > weeks with two guys from the Netherlands. They often commented on both the > poor driving skills and poor condition of many of the cars in the US. As we > rode through the Appalachians one my favorite lines - " I don't understand > every other store we pass sells car parts but all the cars are pieces of > junk." > > I think what you said here illustrates why the "stats" discussed recently > appear confusing or conflicting. We have a problem one symptom of which is > cyclists getting into accidents with automobiles. We're treating this > symptom by adding bike lanes, creating separate bike-ways, painting > right-of-ways, lane dieting, etc. There is something to be said for this. > However, at some point unless you are just riding a recreational bike path > you will need to cross busy intersections and ride on streets that don't > have protected bike lanes. The separate bicycling infrastructure reinforces > the idea that bikes have thier own place and I (as a car driver) don't have > to worry about them- a sort of "out of sight out of mind". If the same > lanes, signage, signals, etc. were both universally adopted and consistently > implemented across the country (or even just from city to city in the same > states) it would have a very positive impact. Rigth now I suspect that areas > with well conceieved and con > structed cycling infrastructure are safer than areas that don't have this > but places that have only partially implemented this stuff (some streets > have bike lanes, many don't or the lanes come and go, or some areas of town > are much more bicycle friendly than others) have done little to increase > cycling safety. > > The real problem in the US is that drivers neither expect or respect > cyclist on the roads. Your statement "one of the things that were > drilled into our heads was to look over the right shoulder before turning > right, to make sure there was no cyclist in the blind angle" explains the > difference. You were trained to EXPECT cyclists on the road and in doing > this the country (in making sure you were trained) was showing a certain > RESPECT for cyclists. The mind set in most of the US is that roads are for > cars and bicycles have no business being on them. > > The real issue is the lack of consideration by motorists which we are doing > little to change- especially when you see cases like that farce a few months > back in Aspen were the big-money Mercedes driving banker pretty much ran > over a cyclist and got off with nothing but a slap on the wrist. I don't > expect this to change in the US. Eventually (many years from now) cycling > will become safer in America not because American drivers will become more > skilled, aware, or considerate but because automobiles will become > "smarter". The technology and imaging systems now being installed on very > high-end cars will improve and eventually trickle down. The drivers will > still be distracted and stupid enough to run down cyclists and pedestrians > but hopefully the cars will be too smart to let them do it in most cases. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Touring mailing list > [email protected] > Browse and search the archives: http://search.bikelist.org > Unsubscribe or list settings: > http://www.phred.org/mailman/options/touring >