Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system)

Invent Yourself <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, And Rosta wrote:

> xod:
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, And Rosta wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > > > Invent Yourself scripsit:
> > > >
> > > > > > Rather, CLL lo'e is about *characteristic* properties. It is
> > > characteristic
> > > > > > of lions to live in Africa, to have short intestines, and to eat
> > > antelope.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ideal? Prototypical? Definitional? Can you give us an algorithm for
> > > > > deriving the "characteristic instance"? Otherwise, I don't know how
> to
> > > > > distinguish it from a stereotype but for the potentially offensive
> > > quality
> > > > > of the latter.
> > > >
> > > > le'e stereotypes are subjective (not necessarily offensive); lo'e
> > > archetypes
> > > > are objective (meaning that all, or all reasonable persons, agree on
> them;
> > > > "it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent").
> > >
> > > Although I am happy with CLL-lo'e as a minor & peripheral member of the
> > > gadri system, I believe CLL-le'e is downright broken. That is, given the
> > > meaning of e-gadri and the meaning of CLL-lo'e, there is no way that
> > > le'e can, without inconsistency, have the meaning that CLL ascribes to
> > > it. Rather, {le'e nanmu cu broda} must make a generalization about the
> > > members of le'i nanmu, rather than a statement about the speaker's
> > > stereotype of nanmu.
> >
> > This is the logical conclusion of your belief that an algorithm is
> > nonessential for lo'e'e!
>
> No, my conclusions about what le'e must mean have nothing to do with how
> the typicality of lo'e is defined. Rather, I argue that if lo'e makes
> typicality claims about the membership of lo'i broda, then le'e makes
> typicality claims about the membership of le'i broda.
>
> > I am willing to accept the Wide Survey definition
> > which John agreed to.
> >
> > le'i is bounded by the nanmu which the speaker has in mind.
>
> Just so.
>
> > The le'i nanmu for deriving le'e namu might differ from the le'i nanmu
> > used to determine if lo broda is le nanmu.
>
> ??? Sorry. I don't understand what you're saying.



I was trying to prevent you from back-deducing that le nanmu is forever
restricted to the nanmu that the speaker thinks is stereotypical.




-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.