[jira] [Assigned] (XERCESJ-1766) please clearly mark which github repo is correct

"Elliotte Rusty Harold (Jira)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Elliotte Rusty Harold reassigned XERCESJ-1766:
----------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Mukul Gandhi

> please clearly mark which github repo is correct
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESJ-1766
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1766
>             Project: Xerces2-J
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Samael Bate
>            Assignee: Mukul Gandhi
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png
>
>
> there are 2 github repos for Xerces:
>  * [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/] (last published artifact: {{{}xerces:xerces:2.4.0{}}})
>  * [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/] (last published artifact: {{{}xerces:xercesImpl:2.12.2{}}})
> the xerces-j repo appears to be much more up to date than the xerces2-j one despite the fact that the xerces-j repo seems to be where most people are making pull requests.
> Neither provide a clear indication of the reason for having two repositories or which one is considered active. 
> Looking at the history of each I can see that up until April 2019 they seem to have the same changes:
> [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/commits/main]
> [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/commits/trunk/]
> although the commit hash's differ:
> !image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png|width=1029,height=408!
>  
> If it is the case that [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/] is the correct repo to use then please make the other one read-only with a note to let users know. It's confusing and could be wasting peoples time if they are making PR's to a dead repo. There are currently 10 pull requests on the [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/pulls] repo, perhaps they need rebasing onto xerces-j.
>  
> also, please consider merging [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/pull/1] as I have another branch that I want to make a pull request for but would like to at least have some CI in place first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.