Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

On 7/23/2026 12:26 AM, Andrew wrote:
> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He --dropped dead-- right after getting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VAXXED!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely an atheist, since they are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all strongly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pro vax.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting. Have you asked every one of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not how can you say "all" did anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a newsgroup called alt.atheism,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The one you constantly spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They were all heavily pro vax. There are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them now -still left- who haven't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped dead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a general rule, they do not think for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They believe whatever the agenda is they 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are "told".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They also believe the *molecules to man* 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deception.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An "unscientific fantasy" Yet they believe it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are "believers".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups are dying. If it wasn't for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal sites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involving movies, TV, radio, and so forth it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally gone. ISP's put it on life support 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they eliminated their news servers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that Usenet will be around forever! 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For starters, nearly every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other media site (e.g., Facebook, YouTube, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.) is moderated, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet is, to an extent, also moderated, but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get kicked from Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires something more offensive than just 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressing ones ideas, even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if such is vitriolic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most people don't know it even exists, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> activity is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dying. One very active group I know of is now 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this one would be except for about six users. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> younger users ever come here any more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone under 50 out there? With 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respect if I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong - remember all I have to go by are your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give little indication as to age.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! I'm 58. Some younger people are here (Jojo?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, in case anyone missed it I am 87.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Soon to reach your first century. Congratulations!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Save it. That is very unlikely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only about 40% of my heart works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i think if you are this mentally active at that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> age, i feel 100 will happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am about 10 years into a quad bypass so I doubt 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your life expediency would be influenced if you have any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional co-morbidity factors such as diabetes and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a history of smoking, or alcohol, or illegal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drug use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I smoked for over 40 years, went cold turkey in early 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and haven't touched one since. My mother, father, ex- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wife,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and daughter smoked all their lives.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know how old your parents were when they passed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had three to five drinks every night for over 20 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing you're still with us. Did you have good doctors?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then noticed one day I hadn't had one in years. I have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.75 L bottle of Bicardi unopened I have had for about 15
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I live alone and will only last as long as I can do 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please teach someone how to notify us when you pass so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we would know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we would like to know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully you are not having too much pain here in your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you're not a puke, you're acting like one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawn, always good to hear from you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully you will get all of those old taxes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paid off..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may recall, Jesus specifically told us to pay our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxes. So that would be important
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for us to do that. Surely you would agree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Matthew 22:21
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark 12:17
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Luke 20:25
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not believe that the literal words of Jesus are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recorded in any of the Gospels, canonical or otherwise. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some ideas of Jesus are certainly found in the Gospel of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark with a few in Luke & Matthew (those that they did not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copy from Mark) and none in the Gospel of John.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, so, what Jesus said about taxes, if anything, is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably lost to time. I suspect that he said very little 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about that, as he and his earliest followers believed that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the World would end within the time frame of Jesus' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preaching. Of course, it didn't, which explains Jesus' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated wails of, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me?", which is the longest Aramaic phrase in the New 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Testament and is almost surely authentic. The author of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke, of course, did not like that, which is why he 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replaced it with something else "Father, into your hands I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commend my spirit", which attests to the authenticity of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Marcan account and why Luke is all but a hagiography.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this what you told IRS when they asked..why you failed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to pay?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The IRS has not called me. I did not pay my taxes because I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> lacked the money to do so, but, I am on a payment plan now! 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure how long that will take!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hopefully you have a good job to help
>>>>>>>>> get it taken care of as soon as possible
>>>>>>>>> May peace be in your heart, whatever..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So sorry about that. Before I leave for today, I would like 
>>>>>>>>>>> to give you a *big hug* right now over this internet forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peace.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, Andrew; we're (just) friends.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I consider most all atheists as friend, because they
>>>>>>>>> have always helped strengthen my faith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrew,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you truly believe, then continue! 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I truly believe what is supported by 'rock solid science'. If 
>>>>>>> atheists believe otherwise, then I respect their right
>>>>>>> to do so. Nevertheless, I would kindly point out their
>>>>>>> foolishness.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As long as you respect the rights of others to disagree and even 
>>>>>>>> not to believe at all, then there are no issues!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I note that atheists will generally believe whatever the 
>>>>>>> consensus.says, even though what they believe may be
>>>>>>> different than 'rock solid science'. Nevertheless I will 
>>>>>>> certainly - respect their right- to believe their cherished
>>>>>>> fantasies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science is determined by scientists, 
>>>>>
>>>>> Empirical science is defined by a methodological commitment to 
>>>>> evidence- based inquiry, where
>>>>> theoretical constructs are grounded in and tested by observable, 
>>>>> measurable and repeatable phenomena.
>>>>>
>>>>> As opposed to the many fantasized hypotheses that are concocted in 
>>>>> the realm of the fantasies of our
>>>>> atheist friends.
>>>>>
>>>>> True science is observable, testable, and repeatable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now a group of scientists may come to a *consensus*
>>>>> that will accord with their agreed upon preconceived prejudice.That 
>>>>> doesn't mean it is *truth*. Nor does it
>>>>> mean it is *science*.
>>>>>> who, after all, are the ones who are writing the scientific papers 
>>>>>> & textbooks.
>>>>>> (Well, that's at least my opinion.)
>>>>>
>>>>> You believe whatever they say.
>>>>> Dawn in a ~~> "believer"..
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We've been through this before:
>>>>
>>>> https://ncse.ngo/kitzmiller-trial-transcripts
>>>
>>> You are _a believer_ in the consensus of atheistic orthodoxy,
>>> regardless of the foolishness of its constructs. Yet you STILL
>>> believe.
>>> The atheistic consensus thinks (fantasises) that life originated
>>> by naturalistic only processes.And refuse to acknowledge any
>>> evidence showing them otherwise.
>>>
>>>> Now, you can go on & on (and, I am sure that you will) about how 
>>>> unfair the verdict was and why the losers decided not to appeal and 
>>>> other blah, blah, blah...
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> It is always better to side with truth. And empirical science would 
>>> always be preferred rather than fantasy for those who
>>> choose truth.
>>>
>>> So what is your choice?
>>
>> I am going to go with what former Judge John E. Jones III stated, 
>> namely, that "intelligent design is not a legitimate scientific theory".
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> It is not a "theory". It is an "origins model".
> And it is the~only one~that accords ->with the evidence.
> 
> Therefore to reject it as a legitimate origins
> model, would be to reject all of the evidence
> that tells us it is.
> One is free to do so.but then they identify
> themselves to be a fool.
> 

And, so, you agree with Judge Jones' decision??