Re: [PEAR-DOC] peardoc: PhD and Docbook5
[email protected] (Arnaud Limbourg)
| Newsgroups | php.pear.doc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Wiesemann wrote: > Hi, > > there is a TODO list in the wiki about the needed things for making > peardoc ready for Hannes' new PhD system: > http://wiki.pear.php.net/index.php/PEARDocMoveToDocbook5 > > I'll take care of items 1 and 3 (together with the phpdoc people), Helgi > will take care of item 2. > > I've discussed with Helgi that it could make sense to start from scratch > with a "new" manual, that is maintained in the new SVN repository and > could be build (and "shown") on maybe docs2.pear.php.net. This new > manual could start with Docbook 5 converted versions of the current > general chapters, and get the package chapters back one after the other, > including a clean-up of outdated pages. > > This approach wouldn't break the current manual and its translations, > and would lead to a very clean new manual. That sounds like a very good idea. I was wondering about that and think it is the best approach as well. > The very much outdated translations (i.e. Dutch, Hungarian, Polish, > Russian, Spanish) wouldn't be converted, and thus get lost, but IMHO > they wouldn't help anybody in their current form. It can even give wrong info. > If anybody agrees or disagrees on these ideas, please share your ideas > on the list. Thinking about pear2 how will we see the difference in the manual between pear1 packages and pear2 (when there will be some) ? -- Arnaud.