Re: [PEAR-DOC] peardoc: PhD and Docbook5

[email protected] (Arnaud Limbourg)
Newsgroups php.pear.doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mark Wiesemann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> there is a TODO list in the wiki about the needed things for making 
> peardoc ready for Hannes' new PhD system:
> http://wiki.pear.php.net/index.php/PEARDocMoveToDocbook5
> 
> I'll take care of items 1 and 3 (together with the phpdoc people), Helgi 
> will take care of item 2.
> 
> I've discussed with Helgi that it could make sense to start from scratch 
> with a "new" manual, that is maintained in the new SVN repository and 
> could be build (and "shown") on maybe docs2.pear.php.net. This new 
> manual could start with Docbook 5 converted versions of the current 
> general chapters, and get the package chapters back one after the other, 
> including a clean-up of outdated pages.
> 
> This approach wouldn't break the current manual and its translations, 
> and would lead to a very clean new manual.

That sounds like a very good idea. I was wondering about that and think 
it is the best approach as well.

> The very much outdated translations (i.e. Dutch, Hungarian, Polish, 
> Russian, Spanish) wouldn't be converted, and thus get lost, but IMHO 
> they wouldn't help anybody in their current form.

It can even give wrong info.

> If anybody agrees or disagrees on these ideas, please share your ideas 
> on the list.

Thinking about pear2 how will we see the difference in the manual 
between pear1 packages and pear2 (when there will be some) ?

-- 
Arnaud.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.