Re: [PATCH ath-current 2/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: ath11k-pci: deprecate 'firmware-name' property

On 12/01/2026 20:51, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 12/11/2025 7:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/12/2025 17:44, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> On 12/3/2025 11:11 PM, Miaoqing Pan wrote:
>>>> The firmware-name property was introduced to allow end-users and
>>>> integrators to select usecase specific firmware for the WCN6855.
>>>> However, specifying firmware for an M.2 WLAN module in the Device
>>>> Tree is not appropriate. Instead, this functionality will be handled
>>>> within the ath11k driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml        | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml
>>>> index e34d42a30192..0162e365798b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml
>>>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
>>>>  
>>>>    firmware-name:
>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>> +    deprecated: true
>>>>      description:
>>>>        If present, a board or platform specific string used to lookup
>>>>        usecase-specific firmware files for the device.
>>>
>>> The driver patch completely removes support for this, so is this really
>>> considered deprecated? Or should this actually be considered obsolete and
>>
>> That's silent ABI break. I will formally NAK the patch.
>>
>>
>>> completely removed?
>>>
>>> Do any DTS files actually reference this?
>>>
>>> /jeff
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> Krzysztof,
> Can you check the v2 to see if you still want to NAK?
> 
> https://msgid.link/[email protected]
> 

First, yes, still NAK.

Second, that patch faked Rob's tag, so it is unacceptable!

Best regards,
Krzysztof