Re: Status of VMS - Unix compatibilty Extended in blead.
[email protected] (Rafael Garcia-Suarez)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.porters,perl.vmsperl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/2/15 Craig A. Berry <[email protected]>: > > On Feb 15, 2009, at 4:43 AM, demerphq wrote: > >>> Miscellaneous fixes to Install. >>> >>> lib/ExtUtils/Install.pm >>> lib/ExtUtils/t/INST.t >>> lib/ExtUtils/t/INST_PREFIX.t >>> >>> Submitted to cpan.org >>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=42149 >> >> Just for the record I would prefer that this goes into blead before it >> is released as a standalone module. So for instance if a VMS committer >> is happy with the change they should apply it to blead and let me >> know. I cant evaluate the correctness of a VMS patch at all (although >> i do trust you :-). > > > OK, it's in: > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commit/3d55b45 > > I'm happy to do this, but I'll need to be reminded every time it comes up > since the general rule is to send patches upstream first and let them come > into blead as integrations (unless there are compelling reasons, like > clearing a lot of smoke). There doesn't seem to be an upstream/downstream > workflow that works well for everybody all the time. No. But I just encoded this info in Maintainers.pl : http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/bf63da66ae0bd087 So you can do : $ perl Porting/Maintainers --module Install ExtUtils::Install yves blead Check out Porting/Maintainers, it's handy.