gmane.comp.file-systems.ext3.user archive

382 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Milos rovcanin ti je poslao poruku...
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:01:53 +0000
Badoo <[email protected]> • #4948
Re: E2fsprogs 1.42 is released!
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:23:16 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4947
E2fsprogs 1.42 is released!
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:54:23 -0500
"Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4946
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:26:52 +0100
Bodo Thiesen <[email protected]> • #4945
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:09:34 +0100
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4944
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:58:06 +0100
Bodo Thiesen <[email protected]> • #4943
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:42:56 +0100
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4942
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:17:25 +0200
Markus Peuhkuri <[email protected]> • #4941
Re: damaged encrypted LUKS device
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:40:04 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #4940
damaged encrypted LUKS device
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:15:42 +0100
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4939
Re: High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4
Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:21:07 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4938
High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4
Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Kristen Eisenberg <[email protected]> • #4937
power outage turned raid ext3 into ext2, how to fix ?
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:44:00 +0200
ghoulsblade <[email protected]> • #4936
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:13:48 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4935
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:44:45 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4934
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:36:06 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4933
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:08:32 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4932
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:29:42 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4931
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:21:27 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4930
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:16:12 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> • #4929
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:41:34 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4928
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:04:47 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4927
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:46:49 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4926
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:19:30 -0600
Bob <[email protected]> • #4925
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:48:39 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4924
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:43:53 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4923
Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:52:52 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4922
Fwd: Re: ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:14:57 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4921
ext3 with maildir++ = huge disk latency and high load
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:51:19 +0400
Andrey <[email protected]> • #4920
Re: damaged partition
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:21:55 +0200
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4919
Re: damaged partition
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:22:07 -0700
Stephen Samuel <[email protected]> • #4918
Re: damaged partition
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:33:29 +0200
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4917
Re: damaged partition
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:41:36 +0200
Bodo Thiesen <[email protected]> • #4916
damaged partition
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:24:15 +0200
Markus Feldmann <[email protected]> • #4915
Re: High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:38:58 -0300
Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]> • #4914
High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:33:16 -0500
"Mccauliff, Sean D. (ARC-PX)[Lockheed Martin Space OPNS]" <[email protected]> • #4913
Re: How long should resize2fs take?
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:29:13 +0100
Alan Pope <[email protected]> • #4912
Re: How long should resize2fs take?
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:56:02 +0100
Alan Pope <[email protected]> • #4911
Re: How long should resize2fs take?
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:27:49 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4910
How long should resize2fs take?
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:48:51 +0100
Alan Pope <[email protected]> • #4909
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:42:33 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4908
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:26:59 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4907
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:19:34 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4906
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:59 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4905
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:34:27 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> • #4904
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:27 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4903
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:06:15 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4902
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:08:24 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4901
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:10:45 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4900
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:48:13 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4899
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:41:05 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4898
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:41:27 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4897
Re: extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:19:29 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4896
Re: Allocation of Indirect Blocks
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:52:48 -0300
Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]> • #4895
extcarve - ext2,ext3,ext4 file carving tool
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:26:39 +0530
"Lakshmipathi.G" <[email protected]> • #4894
(unknown)
Mon, 23 May 2011 04:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Muhammed Sameer <[email protected]> • #4893
Re: How to mount ext3 root partition with noatime and ro options at boot-time
Tue, 17 May 2011 20:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Christian Kujau <[email protected]> • #4892
Re: How to mount ext3 root partition with noatime and ro options at boot-time
Tue, 17 May 2011 20:13:50 -0700
Stephen Samuel <[email protected]> • #4891
Re: How to mount ext3 root partition with noatime and ro options at boot-time
Tue, 17 May 2011 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Christian Kujau <[email protected]> • #4890
How to mount ext3 root partition with noatime and ro options at boot-time
Mon, 16 May 2011 18:42:33 +0530
Amey <[email protected]> • #4889
Re: Using stride on non-RAID
Mon, 09 May 2011 18:03:22 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4888
Re: Using stride on non-RAID
Mon, 9 May 2011 18:40:20 -0400
Mag Gam <[email protected]> • #4887
Re: Allocation of Indirect Blocks
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:15:57 -0700
Sean McCauliff <[email protected]> • #4886
Re: Allocation of Indirect Blocks
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:13:11 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4885
Allocation of Indirect Blocks
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:07:21 -0700
Sean McCauliff <[email protected]> • #4884
Re: ext3 and forced unit access to flush disk cache
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:34:08 -0400
Ric Wheeler <[email protected]> • #4883
ext3 and forced unit access to flush disk cache
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:51:29 -0700
Mark Busheman <[email protected]> • #4882
RE: Resizing a file system that has been converted to ext4
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:24:16 -0500
"Mccauliff, Sean D. (ARC-PX)[Lockheed Martin Space OPNS]" <[email protected]> • #4881
assertion journal->j_running_transaction != NULL fails in commit
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 04:37:31 -0500
<[email protected]> • #4880
Re: Resizing a file system that has been converted to ext4
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:21:06 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> • #4879
Re: Resizing a file system that has been converted to ext4
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:40:20 -0700
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4878
Resizing a file system that has been converted to ext4
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 16:08:29 -0700
Sean McCauliff <[email protected]> • #4877
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:01:00 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4876
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:43:20 +0100
[email protected] (Peter Grandi) • #4875
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:52:21 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4874
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:44:10 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4873
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:25:23 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4872
Re: Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:53:11 -0400
"Ted Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #4871
Ext3: Why data=journal is better than data=ordered when data needs to be read from and written to disk at the same time
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:20:08 -0400
Jidong Xiao <[email protected]> • #4870
Re: Using stride on non-RAID
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:02:34 -0400
David Shaw <[email protected]> • #4869
Re: Using stride on non-RAID
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:53:55 -0500
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4868
Using stride on non-RAID
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:42:35 -0400
David Shaw <[email protected]> • #4867
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:24:46 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4866
minus disk usage
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:53:16 +0900
GMO-HS Yoichi Takahashi <[email protected]> • #4865
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:05:12 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4864
Re: minus disk usage
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:00:33 +0900
GMO-HS Yoichi Takahashi <[email protected]> • #4863
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:50:43 -0800
Stephen Samuel <[email protected]> • #4862
RE : ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Sat, 5 Mar 2011 16:52:50 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4861
RE : ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Sat, 5 Mar 2011 16:52:33 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4860
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:21:38 +0000
Alex Bligh <[email protected]> • #4859
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:17:55 -0700
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> • #4858
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:13:45 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4857
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:07:34 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4856
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:59:08 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4855
Re: minus disk usage
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:55:52 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4854
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:54:23 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4853
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:44:38 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4852
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:33:23 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4851
Re: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:26:12 -0600
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> • #4850
RE: ext3_free_blocks_sb when removing a more than 1GB file
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:45:39 +0100
Stephane Cerveau <[email protected]> • #4849
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.