gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel archive

2133 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 22). Latest articles →

Re: java to native code and Sun JVM alternatives
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
wagde <[email protected]> • #17581
Re: unable to regenerate the pregenerated libjava header files on the trunk
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:24:24 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17580
brigitte guegan
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Pete Kelly <[email protected]> • #17579
Re: java to native code and Sun JVM alternatives
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:56:07 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17578
java to native code and Sun JVM alternatives
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:45:21 -0800 (PST)
wagde <[email protected]> • #17577
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:17:32 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17576
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:36:30 -0500
[email protected] (Lennart Sorensen) • #17575
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:44:59 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17574
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:41:09 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17573
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:34:56 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17572
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:45:56 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17571
Re: FROM FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SEEKING TO WIRETAP NTERNET
Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:06:32 H0300
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) <[email protected]> • #17570
Re: Static class members & DWARF
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:13:03 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17569
Static class members & DWARF
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:48:53 -0800
Keith Seitz <[email protected]> • #17568
Dummy resources in object files?
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:27:54 +0100
Michele Bini <[email protected]> • #17567
Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:54:44 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17566
Re: unable to regenerate the pregenerated libjava header files on the trunk
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:24:19 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17565
unable to regenerate the pregenerated libjava header files on the trunk
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:55:54 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17564
icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:49:43 +0100
Matthias Klose <doko-GeWIH/[email protected]> • #17563
Re: [SAXParser] org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: not a name start character:
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:51:51 +0100
[email protected] • #17562
Re: [SAXParser] org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: not a name start character: "U+26"
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:49:00 +0000
Chris Burdess <[email protected]> • #17561
Re: Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:39:54 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17560
Re: Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:21:43 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17559
RE: Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:21:08 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17558
Re: Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:13:26 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17557
RE: Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:05:57 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17556
Two quick GC questions [was Re: [REVIVED: PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:58:34 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17555
PR16923 failure on darwin
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:58:56 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17554
JVMTI events system and _jvmtiEnvironments uninitialised memory problem? [was Re: [PATCH PR42811,4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1]
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:40:56 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17553
Re: [SAXParser] org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: not a name start character: "U+26"
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:36:30 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17552
[SAXParser] org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: not a name start character: "U+26"
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:24:10 +0100
Emmanuel Engelhart <[email protected]> • #17551
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:20:22 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17550
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:06:57 +0000
Stephen Kell <[email protected]> • #17549
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:57:31 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17548
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:45:47 +0000
Stephen Kell <[email protected]> • #17547
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:44:34 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17546
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:09:12 +0000
Stephen Kell <[email protected]> • #17545
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:41:17 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17544
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:51:06 +0000
Stephen Kell <[email protected]> • #17543
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:53:17 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17542
Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:32:51 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17541
Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:38:35 +0000
Stephen Kell <[email protected]> • #17540
RE: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:51:47 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17539
Re: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:34:05 -0800
Justin Santa Barbara <[email protected]> • #17538
Learn How To Profit From Failure
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:43:05 -0800
"Bankruptcy Realty Profits, Inc." <[email protected]> • #17537
Re: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:56:27 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17536
Re: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Hans Boehm <[email protected]> • #17535
Re: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:50:33 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17534
How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:40:43 -0800
Justin Santa Barbara <[email protected]> • #17533
is there any alternatives to avoid Cannot load AWT toolkit error?
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:20:13 +0900
jojelino <[email protected]> • #17532
Re: Patch: move lang_specific_driver after setup of cc_libexec_prefix
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" <[email protected]> • #17531
ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:39:54 +0900
"jojelino" <[email protected]> • #17530
Re: RFD: Precompile ecj [Was Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?]
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:26:04 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17529
Re: RFD: Precompile ecj [Was Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?]
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:59:58 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17528
RFD: Precompile ecj [Was Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?]
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:39:23 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17527
Patch: move lang_specific_driver after setup of cc_libexec_prefix
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:06:16 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17526
Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:00:53 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17525
Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:57:54 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17524
Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:05:31 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17523
Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:59:34 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17522
Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:03:48 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17521
libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:07:46 +0530
abhishek desai <[email protected]> • #17520
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:17:09 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17519
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:43:19 -0800
John Poole <[email protected]> • #17518
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:41:27 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17517
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:59:52 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17516
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:44:55 -0800
John Poole <[email protected]> • #17515
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:31:21 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17514
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:14:07 -0800
John Poole <[email protected]> • #17513
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:28:23 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17512
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:17:27 -0800
John Poole <[email protected]> • #17511
Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:49:33 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17510
GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:36:28 -0800
John Poole <[email protected]> • #17509
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:57:28 +0100
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17508
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:44:55 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17507
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:09:45 +0100
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17506
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:44:35 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17505
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:39:45 +0100
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17504
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:09:49 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17503
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:34:45 +0100
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17502
Re: problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:46:57 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17501
problem with class accessiblity check in invoke (natMethod.cc)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:38:22 +0100
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17500
Off-line today
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:31 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17499
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:47:12 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17498
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:12:34 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17497
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:03:11 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17496
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:25:53 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17495
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:25:00 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17494
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:19:52 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17493
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:14:30 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17492
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:02:59 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17491
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:30:31 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17490
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:57:41 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17489
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:54:15 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17488
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:49:07 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17487
Re: Making -findirect-dispatch the default?
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:27:23 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17486
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:26:10 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17485
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:47:25 -0500
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17484
Making -findirect-dispatch the default?
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:44:50 +0100
Herman ten Brugge <[email protected]> • #17483
Re: _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction vs darwin
Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:07:12 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17482
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.