gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel archive

2133 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 22). Latest articles →

Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:06:45 -0400
Geert Bosch <[email protected]> • #17681
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:48:39 -0700
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #17680
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:47:36 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17679
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:33:50 +0100
Steven Bosscher <[email protected]> • #17678
PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:09:26 -0700
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17677
Re: [Devjam] Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 DevRoom Proposal
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:20:14 +0100
Gary Benson <[email protected]> • #17676
Re: Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 DevRoom Proposal
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:15:54 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17675
Re: Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 DevRoom Proposal
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:12:39 +0200
Mario Torre <[email protected]> • #17674
Re: Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 DevRoom Proposal
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:01:54 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17673
Re: Status of the GJC
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:41:53 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17672
Re: Status of the GJC
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:30:14 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17671
Re: Status of the GJC
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:26:32 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17670
Re: Status of the GJC
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:02:03 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17669
Re: Status of the GJC
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:56:06 -0400
Harpal Grover <[email protected]> • #17668
Re: Novice question on gcj - Error finding java imports
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:26:06 +0800
Vincent Lim <[email protected]> • #17667
Re: Status of the GJC
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:35:14 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17666
Re: Status of the GJC
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:44:36 +0200
Paulo Pinto <[email protected]> • #17665
Re: Novice question on gcj - Error finding java imports
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:38:38 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17664
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:25:41 -0700
Richard Henderson <[email protected]> • #17663
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:11:40 +0200
Eric Botcazou <[email protected]> • #17662
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:06:51 -0700
Richard Henderson <[email protected]> • #17661
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:14:17 -0700
Mark Mitchell <[email protected]> • #17660
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:53:48 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17659
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:23:08 +0200
Olivier Hainque <[email protected]> • #17658
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:21 +0200
Arnaud Charlet <[email protected]> • #17657
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:02:59 +0200
Eric Botcazou <[email protected]> • #17656
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:58:03 -0700
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17655
Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:10:46 -0400
Jason Merrill <[email protected]> • #17654
[RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:59:13 -0700
Richard Henderson <[email protected]> • #17653
Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 DevRoom Proposal
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:08:22 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17652
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:02:01 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17651
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:49:50 +0200
Andreas Frisch <[email protected]> • #17650
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:58:40 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17649
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:06:57 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17648
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:53:15 +0200
Andreas Frisch <[email protected]> • #17647
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:06:55 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17646
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:51:40 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17645
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:44:46 +0200
Andreas Frisch <[email protected]> • #17644
Re: gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:25:34 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17643
gcj static crosscompiling raises issues with boehm-gc
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:43:19 +0200
Andreas Frisch <[email protected]> • #17642
Re: gcj fails to compile java
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:35:48 -0400
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17641
Re: gcj fails to compile java
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:21:45 +0100
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17640
gcj fails to compile java
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:20:36 -0400
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17639
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:02:14 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17638
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:51:42 +0100
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17637
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:05:01 -0400
Josh Marinacci <[email protected]> • #17636
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:09:12 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17635
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:18:31 -0400
Josh Marinacci <[email protected]> • #17634
Re: Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:55:16 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17633
Advice on compiling GCJ for ARM
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:14:42 -0400
Josh Marinacci <[email protected]> • #17632
RE: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:27:02 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17631
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:07:48 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17630
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:59:46 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17629
[wwwdocs] adjust pdftk URL in java/done.html
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 05:18:50 +0200 (CEST)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17628
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" <[email protected]> • #17627
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:28:45 +0200
Steven Bosscher <[email protected]> • #17626
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:48:47 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17625
Re: RFH: optabs code in the java front end
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:11:26 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17624
Re: GCJ and RMI on Fedora Core 12
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:25:54 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17623
GCJ and RMI on Fedora Core 12
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:59:40 -0400
"Craig W. Martin" <[email protected]> • #17622
Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:14:25 -0600
Tom Tromey <[email protected]> • #17621
Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:48:53 -0500
Brett Neumeier <[email protected]> • #17620
Re: NOTIFICATION OF BEQUEST
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:35:43 +0200 (CEST)
Eric & Welsh Associates <[email protected]>, "X-EsetResult:clean"@nefty • #17619
Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:19:12 -0500
Brett Neumeier <[email protected]> • #17618
Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:37:22 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17617
Re: Source for current ECJ not available on sourceware.org
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:25:38 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17616
Cfp - Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems - EXT. DEADLINE JUNE 13
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:50:46 +0200
Tomas Kalibera <[email protected]> • #17615
can get mouse events with javac but not gcj ... what's wrong?
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:47:05 -0400
Bearish <[email protected]> • #17614
Cfp - Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems - 1 WEEK TO DEADLINE
Mon, 31 May 2010 14:32:14 +0200
Tomas Kalibera <[email protected]> • #17613
na go qu ke do lu ha
Mon, 17 May 2010 02:34:36 +0000
le xa bo <[email protected]> • #17612
Re: formatting floating point problem
Mon, 10 May 2010 09:10:27 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17611
formatting floating point problem
Sun, 9 May 2010 19:19:05 -0400
Erwin Kalvelagen <[email protected]> • #17610
????? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????
7 May 2010 23:33:55 -0000
[email protected] • #17609
Cfp - Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems - 1 MONTH TO DEADLINE
Fri, 7 May 2010 11:55:11 +0200
Tomas Kalibera <[email protected]> • #17608
Re: Fwd: GCJ version 4.3.3 (gcc --enable-languages) error : The import acm cannot be resolved
Fri, 07 May 2010 10:14:58 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17607
Fwd: GCJ version 4.3.3 (gcc --enable-languages) error : The import acm cannot be resolved
Fri, 7 May 2010 10:05:19 +0100
Malik Benkirane <[email protected]> • #17606
Re: 100%CPU when using ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor only with GCJ
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:48:52 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17605
100%CPU when using ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor only with GCJ
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Lon Palmer <[email protected]> • #17604
Introduction/Josm porting to gcj compiler
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:26:29 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #17603
Re: PR43839 almost fixed
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:31 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17602
PR43839 almost fixed
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:25:30 -0400
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17601
Re: gcj for j2me
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:10:51 -0600 (MDT)
Joel Dice <[email protected]> • #17600
gcj for j2me
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:50:18 -0400
Monty Hall <[email protected]> • #17599
Re: undefined symbol __gcj_personality_v0
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:31:26 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17598
undefined symbol __gcj_personality_v0
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:08:11 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17597
Re: [PATCH][GOLD] Avoid linker crashing when merge sections have uneven sizes.
Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:47:17 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17596
Re: link error: undefined reference
Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:47:03 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17595
Re: link error: undefined reference
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:07:38 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17594
Re: link error: undefined reference
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:46:35 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17593
Re: 'java.lang.String' has no method
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:40:42 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17592
Re: 'java.lang.String' has no method
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:30:46 +0100
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17591
link error: undefined reference
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:27:17 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17590
Re: 'java.lang.String' has no method
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:54:56 +0000
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17589
Re: 'java.lang.String' has no method
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:51:25 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17588
BEST OFFER
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:32:54 +0100
Rick Roberts <[email protected]> • #17587
Re: 'java.lang.String' has no method
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:26:23 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17586
'java.lang.String' has no method
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:08:33 -0500
Keith <[email protected]> • #17585
JTRES 2010 - Call for Papers
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:03:27 +0100
Tomas Kalibera <[email protected]> • #17584
Re: How to minimize (unshareable) memory usage?
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
hari001 <[email protected]> • #17583
Re: java to native code and Sun JVM alternatives
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:49:05 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17582
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.