gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel archive

2133 archived articles, newest first (page 8 of 22). Latest articles →

Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:56:59 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17781
Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:22:25 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #17780
Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:09:10 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17779
Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:57:40 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17778
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:34:28 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17777
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:02:55 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17776
MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:51:27 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #17775
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:45:18 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17774
GC leaks debugging
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:39:05 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17773
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:51:16 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> • #17772
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:48:42 -0400
NightStrike <[email protected]> • #17771
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:24:17 +0000
Richard Sandiford <[email protected]> • #17770
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:07:35 -0700
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17769
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" <[email protected]> • #17768
Re: Target library disabling at toplevel
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:49:49 +0100
Hans-Peter Nilsson <[email protected]> • #17767
Target library disabling at toplevel
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:51:38 +0000 (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" <[email protected]> • #17766
Re: Must unwind in gcc be ported for gcj?
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:06:57 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17765
Re: Must unwind in gcc be ported for gcj?
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:34:19 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17764
Must unwind in gcc be ported for gcj?
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:19:50 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17763
Re: Another Python namespace pollution
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:32:15 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17762
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:20:59 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17761
Bugzilla spam caused by my merge
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:09:21 -0500
Diego Novillo <[email protected]> • #17760
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:59:59 +0000
Gary Benson <[email protected]> • #17759
Re: Another Python namespace pollution
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:58:20 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17758
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:54:18 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17757
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:59:52 +0000
Gary Benson <[email protected]> • #17756
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:42:55 +0100
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17755
Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:38:01 +0000
Gary Benson <[email protected]> • #17754
Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:48:40 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17753
RE: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Hans Boehm <[email protected]> • #17752
RE: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:58:27 -0500
"Ben Keppler" <[email protected]> • #17751
Re: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:45:01 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17750
RE: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:10:15 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17749
Re: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:53:13 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17748
Re: a question about directory structure of libjava
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:24:20 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17747
Re: a question about directory structure of libjava
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:42:34 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17746
Re: a question about directory structure of libjava
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:08:31 +0000
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17745
a question about directory structure of libjava
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:50:07 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17744
Re: code is not clean. libjava/interpret.cc:1480
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:50:50 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17743
RE: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:56:44 -0500
"Ben Keppler" <[email protected]> • #17742
Re: FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:32:29 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17741
FW: Garbage collection issues in GCJ
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:08:31 -0500
"Ben Keppler" <[email protected]> • #17740
Re: code is not clean. libjava/interpret.cc:1480
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:58:29 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17739
Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 - Talk Schedule
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:44:47 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17738
code is not clean. libjava/interpret.cc:1480
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:20:07 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17737
Re: Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath' for jv-convert
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:28:15 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17736
Re: Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath' for jv-convert
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:22:28 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues <[email protected]> • #17735
Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath' for jv-convert
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:07:26 +0100 (CET)
Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> • #17734
Is there some way to print infos when the interpreter running?
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:10:48 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17733
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:38:22 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17732
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:26:02 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17731
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:01:09 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17730
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:40:07 +0000
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17729
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:33:57 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17728
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:01:05 +0800
majia gm <[email protected]> • #17727
Re: NullPointerException throwed when running GCJ
Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:36:23 -0800
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17726
Re: libgcj.so: undefined reference to `ip'
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:57:28 +0800
Xingxing Pan <[email protected]> • #17725
Re: libgcj.so: undefined reference to `ip'
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17724
libgcj.so: undefined reference to `ip'
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:09:32 +0800
Xingxing Pan <[email protected]> • #17723
Re: Anfrage von Kundennummer KK-140633
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:56:14 +0100 (CET)
Katharina Müller <[email protected]> • #17722
Re: Tree checking failure in jc1
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:24:05 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17721
Tree checking failure in jc1
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:49:35 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17720
Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 - CFP extended to 17 December!
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:31:48 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17719
CFP Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011 - ends this week
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:55:23 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17718
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:52:24 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17717
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:22:40 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17716
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:18:49 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17715
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:02:02 -0800
Diego Novillo <[email protected]> • #17714
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:37:31 -0800
Mark Mitchell <[email protected]> • #17713
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:23:34 -0700
Jeff Law <[email protected]> • #17712
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:42:20 -0800
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17711
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:00:12 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17710
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:23:43 -0800
Mark Mitchell <[email protected]> • #17709
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:20:44 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17708
Re: Status of the GJC
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:42:16 +0000
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17707
Hydrocodone is here at your fingertips and many more!
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:44:14 -0500
"Lillian Woods" <[email protected]> • #17706
Re: Status of the GJC
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:18:24 -0800
Ian Rogers <[email protected]> • #17705
CFP Now Open: Free Java @ FOSDEM 2011
Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:35:54 -0500
Tom Marble <[email protected]> • #17704
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:43:27 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17703
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:24:53 -0600
Jeff Law <[email protected]> • #17702
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:36:11 -0600
Tom Tromey <[email protected]> • #17701
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:35:35 -0600
Tom Tromey <[email protected]> • #17700
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:48:32 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> • #17699
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:13:49 +0100
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #17698
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:21:37 +0100
Eric Botcazou <[email protected]> • #17697
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:12:20 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17696
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:58:01 -0700
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17695
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:39:48 -0600
Jeff Law <[email protected]> • #17694
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:34:56 -0700
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17693
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:58:03 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17692
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:16:48 -0400
Diego Novillo <[email protected]> • #17691
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:50:13 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17690
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:50:57 -0600
Tom Tromey <[email protected]> • #17689
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:35:49 -0700
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #17688
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:47:16 -0400
Joern Rennecke <[email protected]> • #17687
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:35:22 -0400
Geert Bosch <[email protected]> • #17686
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:54:53 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17685
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:34:46 +0000
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17684
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:59:41 +0000
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17683
Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:30:34 -0400
Joern Rennecke <[email protected]> • #17682
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.