gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel archive

2133 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 22). Latest articles →

Re: Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:49:32 -0600
Alan Eliasen <[email protected]> • #17881
About compiling process in GCJ and garbage collection
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:22:58 +0200
Li junsong <[email protected]> • #17880
Re: Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:02:53 +0200
Li junsong <[email protected]> • #17879
Re: Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:24:32 +0100
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17878
Re: Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:57:04 +0200
Li junsong <[email protected]> • #17877
Re: Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:03:21 -0700
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #17876
Why GCJ won't load my plugin when compiling bytecode?
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:56:53 +0200
Li junsong <[email protected]> • #17875
Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:33:00 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> • #17874
Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:19:55 +0200
"Ralf Wildenhues" <[email protected]> • #17873
Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:10:57 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17872
Re: [PATCH] patch for Java on RTEMS
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:07:36 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17871
Re: [PATCH] patch for Java on RTEMS
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:43:19 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17870
Re: Why does a 'new' statement produce so many temporary variables
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:39:40 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17869
Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS
Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:03:45 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17868
[PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:00:13 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17867
Re: Why does a 'new' statement produce so many temporary variables
Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:22:09 -0700
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #17866
Why does a 'new' statement produce so many temporary variables
Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:18:02 +0800
Li junsong <[email protected]> • #17865
?u??????????/?p?U?~???C?????g???C?H?????????????CThu, 11 Aug 2011 10:41:13 +0600
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 04:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
"?H?O?????N?v?C ?}???B???????C?A???q???G?????????????????????E?????G?L?N?v?CThu, 11 Aug 2011 07:39:13 +0300" <[email protected]> • #17864
Re: gnu.gcj.RawData vs. long
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:17:51 +0100
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17863
gnu.gcj.RawData vs. long
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:08:06 -0400
Craig Vanderborgh <[email protected]> • #17862
Re: [PATCH][1/N][C][C++]Change POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset type requirements
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:52:55 -0600
Tom Tromey <[email protected]> • #17861
Re: [PATCH][1/N][C][C++][Java] Change POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset type requirements
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:53:56 -0400
Jason Merrill <[email protected]> • #17860
[PATCH][1/N][C][C++][Fortran]Change POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset type requirements
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:33:10 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17859
Re: RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:53:30 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17858
RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report
Sat, 9 Jul 2011 01:31:26 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17857
libjava patches for RTEMS
Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:14:17 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17856
Re: why doesn't libgcj link against libiconv?
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:53:35 -0400
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17855
why doesn't libgcj link against libiconv?
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:19 -0400
Jack Howarth <[email protected]> • #17854
Re: GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status Report
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:11:51 -0400
Franklin Chou <[email protected]> • #17853
Re: "limitations of static linking." for the Cygwin/Ming port of gcj
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:16:25 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17852
Re: GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status Report
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:14:25 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17851
"limitations of static linking." for the Cygwin/Ming port of gcj
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:49:08 -0400
Franklin Chou <[email protected]> • #17850
GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status Report
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:15:41 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17849
Re: Add a Field to java.lang.Object
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:39:08 +0200
Noah Heusser <[email protected]> • #17848
Re: Add a Field to java.lang.Object
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:31:06 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17847
Add a Field to java.lang.Object
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:05 +0200
Noah Heusser <[email protected]> • #17846
Re: [PING] [PATCH]Sanitize Java frontend global tree building
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:25:24 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17845
[PING] [PATCH][JAVA] Sanitize Java frontend global tree building
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17844
Re: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:38:36 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17843
Re: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:14:37 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17842
Re: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:16:49 +0100
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17841
error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:42:22 +0800
Jie Liu <[email protected]> • #17840
Re: [PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:36:57 +0300
Janne Blomqvist <[email protected]> • #17839
Re: [PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:27:18 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17838
Re: [PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:26:42 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17837
Re: [PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:02:25 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17836
Re: [PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:00:12 +0200
Eric Botcazou <[email protected]> • #17835
[PATCH][all-langs] Defer size_t and sizetype setting to the middle-end
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17834
Re: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?
Wed, 18 May 2011 20:37:11 +0100
Dr Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17833
Re: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?
Wed, 18 May 2011 19:26:57 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17832
FW: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?
Tue, 17 May 2011 14:54:19 -0400
Sean Robert McGuffee <[email protected]> • #17831
Re: Compiling fop to native windows
Wed, 04 May 2011 09:47:58 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17830
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:32:29 +0200
Erik J Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17829
Re: GC leaks debugging
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:49:51 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17828
Re: GC leaks debugging
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:01:28 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17827
Re: GC leaks debugging
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:43:25 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17826
Re: GC leaks debugging
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:35:49 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17825
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:26:55 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17824
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:11:15 +0100
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17823
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:11:40 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17822
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:42:21 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17821
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:03:09 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17820
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 9 Apr 2011 12:55:50 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17819
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:47:21 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17818
RE: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 9 Apr 2011 01:14:18 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17817
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:56:59 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17816
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:52:17 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17815
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:47:55 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17814
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 08 Apr 2011 08:35:06 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17813
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:55:53 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17812
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:11:30 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17811
Re: GC leaks debugging
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:42:34 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17810
Question about GCJ
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:48:15 +1030
Me Myself and I <[email protected]> • #17809
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:38:58 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17808
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:33:36 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17807
Re: GC leaks debugging
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:29:14 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17806
Re: [Mingw-users] Question about GNU Compiler for Java email list.
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:54:44 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #17805
Question about GNU Compiler for Java email list.
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:47:10 +1030
Me Myself and I <[email protected]> • #17804
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:07 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17803
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:02:05 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17802
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:02:01 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17801
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:58:10 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17800
Re: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:49:50 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17799
RE: GC leaks debugging
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:41:53 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17798
Re: MessageBundle ???
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:09:00 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17797
Re: MessageBundle ???
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:04:13 +0200
"dj_def" <[email protected]> • #17796
Re: MessageBundle ???
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:13:34 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17795
MessageBundle ???
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:00:05 +0200
"dj_def" <[email protected]> • #17794
Re: GC leaks debugging
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:48:04 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17793
Re: MessageBundle ???
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:38:06 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17792
Re: GC leaks debugging
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:52:31 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17791
Re: GC leaks debugging
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:13:00 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17790
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:59:20 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17789
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:14:36 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17788
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:20:20 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17787
Re: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:38:51 +0200
Erik Groeneveld <[email protected]> • #17786
RE: GC leaks debugging
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:26:22 +0000
"Boehm, Hans" <[email protected]> • #17785
Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:32:08 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #17784
Re: MessageBundle ???
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:43:43 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17783
Re: GC leaks debugging
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:41:09 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17782
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.