gmane.comp.gnu.aspell.devel archive

464 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:03:08 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1033
Re: Am interested in working for Aspell in Tamil
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:46:08 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1032
Am interested in working for Aspell in Tamil
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:00:53 +0530
"ம.ராமதாஸ்" <[email protected]> • #1031
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:01:25 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1030
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:54:48 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1029
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:49:13 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1028
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:42:07 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1027
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:21:09 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1026
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language ing
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:50:00 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1025
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:19:10 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1024
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:04:48 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1023
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:41:56 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1022
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:32:36 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1021
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:12:39 -0800
"Ethan Bradford" <[email protected]> • #1020
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:29:19 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1019
Re: Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language checking
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:38:54 -0700 (MST)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1018
Thoughts on using aspell for Indian language spellchecking
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:51:03 +0100
<[email protected]> • #1017
Re: [Aspell-user] aspell needs fixed for some platforms
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:33:25 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #1016
Re: [Aspell-user] apell needs fixed for some platforms
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:58:25 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1015
apell needs fixed for some platforms
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:38:50 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #1014
Troy says Hi
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:13:30 -0500
[email protected] • #1013
bug in apell when using pipes?
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:07:58 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #1012
Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 30, Issue 146
Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
Bruce Visscher <[email protected]> • #1011
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:09:51 -0500
"Gary Setter" <[email protected]> • #1010
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:38:43 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #1009
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:20:56 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1008
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:35:11 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #1007
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:48:12 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1006
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:41:37 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #1005
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:32:26 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #1004
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:34:42 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #1003
Re: What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:49:00 -0700
Jose Da Silva <[email protected]> • #1002
What should version info for a libaspell.dll contain?
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:04:09 -0500
"Gary Setter" <[email protected]> • #1001
Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 30, Issue 146
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:02:12 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #1000
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:26:39 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #999
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:26:47 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #998
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:45 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #997
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:58:21 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #996
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:50:33 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #995
Re: Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:48:53 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #994
Bug in vector.hpp
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:49:48 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #993
Re: Incompatibility in emacs & aspell-0.60.4
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:00:21 -0400
Chong Yidong <[email protected]> • #992
Re: Incompatibility in emacs & aspell-0.60.4
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:27:26 -0600
Kevin Rodgers <[email protected]> • #991
Re: Incompatibility in emacs & aspell-0.60.4
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:16:05 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #990
gnu emacs incompatibility?
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:20:36 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #989
Re: Error in configure of aspell6-en-6.0-0.tar.bz2
Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:57:03 -0400
Dmitri Tikhonov <[email protected]> • #988
Error in configure of aspell6-en-6.0-0.tar.bz2
Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:52:44 -0400
Dmitri Tikhonov <[email protected]> • #987
Re: latest aspell stable build fails
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Olivier Kaloudoff <[email protected]> • #986
Re: latest aspell stable build fails
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:28:00 +0200
Olivier Kaloudoff <[email protected]> • #985
Re: latest aspell stable build fails
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:08:17 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #984
latest aspell stable build fails
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:44:53 +0200 (CEST)
Olivier Kaloudoff <[email protected]> • #983
Re: reg datastructure for aspell
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:04:32 -0700
Jose Da Silva <[email protected]> • #982
reg datastructure for aspell
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:52:38 +0530
"Pyla Rama Praveen" <[email protected]> • #981
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:48:36 -0700
Jose Da Silva <[email protected]> • #980
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:43:26 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #979
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:10:14 -0500
"Gary Setter" <[email protected]> • #978
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:46:33 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #977
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:56:48 -0500
"Gary Setter" <[email protected]> • #976
Re: Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 05:10:02 -0600 (MDT)
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> • #975
Possible bug in new_filer.cpp
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:03:39 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #974
aspell-cvs on Windows
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 12:33:14 +0200
Peter Kümmel <[email protected]> • #973
Issue - Report this to the GNU Aspell lists.
Fri, 26 May 2006 10:46:41 -0300
Anderson Wilson <[email protected]> • #972
Re: Re: regarding autocomplete for hindi words
Fri, 19 May 2006 14:06:47 -0700
Jose Da Silva <[email protected]> • #971
Re: Re: regarding autocomplete for hindi words
Fri, 19 May 2006 08:48:15 +0100 (BST)
Gora Mohanty <[email protected]> • #970
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.