gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm archive

1065 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 11). Latest articles →

Re: First push into ASM_4_FUTURE
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:08:00 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3453
Re: First push into ASM_4_FUTURE
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:58:00 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3452
Re: Weird VerifyError
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:17:46 +0200
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3451
Re: First push into ASM_4_FUTURE
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:49 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3450
Re: Weird VerifyError
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:28:08 +0200 (CEST)
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3449
Re: Weird VerifyError
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:12:07 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3448
Weird VerifyError
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:26:56 +0200
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3447
Re: Re: Re: LocalVariableSorter
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:59:34 +0200
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3446
RE: Re: Re: LocalVariableSorter
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
"Tim Eck" <[email protected]> • #3445
Re: Re: LocalVariableSorter
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:02:09 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3444
Re: Re: LocalVariableSorter
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:57:40 +0200
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3443
Re: LocalVariableSorter
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:36:10 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3442
LocalVariableSorter
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:26:17 +0200
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3441
First push into ASM_4_FUTURE
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:16:20 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3440
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:31:48 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3439
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:37:24 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3438
Re: Too long method Code length after instrumentation with ASM
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:39:51 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3437
Re: no label at method end
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:19:45 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3436
no label at method end
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:19:03 +0200 (CEST)
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3435
Too long method Code length after instrumentation with ASM
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:14:40 +0400
Sergey Vorobyev <[email protected]> • #3434
AnalyzerAdapter.visitFrameTypes incorrectly adds Opcodes.TOP after long types
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:42:26 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3433
Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:49:24 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3432
Re: class file extensions in JDK 7, for ASM 4.0
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:52:49 +0100
Ben Evans <[email protected]> • #3431
Re: Getting the return value of a method
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:52:41 -0400
Dave Brosius <[email protected]> • #3430
Re: how to let asm compute frame automatically?
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:57:45 +0800
lucefe <[email protected]> • #3429
Getting the return value of a method
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:45:16 -0700
Nemo Caviani <[email protected]> • #3428
class file extensions in JDK 7, for ASM 4.0
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:37:49 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3427
Re: Swapping long/double values on operand stack
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:16:02 -0400
Dave Brosius <[email protected]> • #3426
how to let asm compute frame automatically?
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:14:11 +0800
lucefe <[email protected]> • #3425
Re: Re: Analyzer for testing code flow correctness
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:24:53 +0200
Marcin Rzeźnicki <[email protected]> • #3424
Re: Re: Analyzer for testing code flow correctness
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:53:17 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3423
Re: Re: Analyzer for testing code flow correctness
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:42:23 +0200
Marcin Rzeźnicki <[email protected]> • #3422
Re: Analyzer for testing code flow correctness
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:14:55 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3421
Re: Inconsistence in calculated stack map info
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:02:58 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3420
Re: Swapping long/double values on operand stack
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:05:03 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3419
Swapping long/double values on operand stack
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:22:42 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3418
Inconsistence in calculated stack map info
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:17:55 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3417
Analyzer for testing code flow correctness
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:41:37 +0200
Marcin Rzeźnicki <[email protected]> • #3416
Re: Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3415
Re: Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:08:07 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3414
Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3413
AnalyzerAdapter.execute() method doesn't process null array correctly for AALOAD instruction
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:40:53 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3412
Re: Re: Re: Handling of NULL at LocalVariablesSorter.visitFrame()
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:06:28 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3411
new project using asm: fun4j
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:40:24 +0200
[email protected] • #3410
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:44:30 +0200 (CEST)
Ping Mao <[email protected]> • #3409
Re: Re: Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:31:15 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3408
Re: Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:02:14 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3407
Re: Re: Handling of NULL at LocalVariablesSorter.visitFrame()
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:57:09 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3406
Re: Handling of NULL at LocalVariablesSorter.visitFrame()
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:46:59 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3405
Handling of NULL at LocalVariablesSorter.visitFrame()
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:36:48 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3404
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:45:39 -0700
Tatu Saloranta <[email protected]> • #3403
Re: Re: Re: Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:08:57 +0200 (CEST)
Ping Mao <[email protected]> • #3402
Re: Re: Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:38:58 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3401
Re: Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
Ping Mao <[email protected]> • #3400
Re: Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:37:59 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3399
Re: Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:37:39 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3398
Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:26:27 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3397
ArrayIndexOutOfBounds when read class
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Ping Mao <[email protected]> • #3396
Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:53:26 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3395
Re: Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:06 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3394
Re: A complete list of JDK classes which CheckClassAdapter fails (bug?)
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:51:36 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3393
Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:20:03 -0700
John Rose <[email protected]> • #3392
Re: Small question on ldc and ldc_w
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:39:01 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3391
Small question on ldc and ldc_w
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:08:37 +0800
Sai Zhang <[email protected]> • #3390
Re: Re: bootstrap methods in the constant pool
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:57:05 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3389
Translate Relational Constraints to Boolean Formula
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:17:16 +0800
"yiqiuping1986" <[email protected]> • #3388
RE: Re: Re: ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
"Tim Eck" <[email protected]> • #3387
Re: Re: ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:09:37 +0800
Sai Zhang <[email protected]> • #3386
Re: RE: ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:47:25 +0200
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #3385
RE: ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
"Tim Eck" <[email protected]> • #3384
Re: ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:24:19 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3383
ASM-based class transformation affect class loading?
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:48:47 -0400
Sai Zhang <[email protected]> • #3382
Re: invoke ClassReader#accept twice
Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:21:41 +0200
Tronje Krop <[email protected]> • #3381
Re: Re: invoke ClassReader#accept twice
Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:49:32 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3380
Re: invoke ClassReader#accept twice
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:16:58 +0200
"luc peuvrier at home" <[email protected]> • #3379
invoke ClassReader#accept twice
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 05:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3378
Re: Re: Problems getting generic signatures of generated classes to show via Reflection
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:24:23 -0700
Tatu Saloranta <[email protected]> • #3377
Re: Problems getting generic signatures of generated classes to show via Reflection
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:56:42 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3376
Problems getting generic signatures of generated classes to show via Reflection
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:24:11 -0700
Tatu Saloranta <[email protected]> • #3375
Re: ClassWriter.COMPUTE_FRAMES & Stack size too large
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:01:43 -0700
Bhaskar Maddala <[email protected]> • #3374
Re: ClassWriter.COMPUTE_FRAMES & Stack size too large
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:50:51 -0700
Scott Vachalek <[email protected]> • #3373
ClassWriter.COMPUTE_FRAMES & Stack size too large
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:43:37 -0700
Bhaskar Maddala <[email protected]> • #3372
Re: Re: Re: Re: Question for using ASM to log the method invocation trace.
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:58:29 +0000 (GMT)
Paul Keeble <[email protected]> • #3371
Re: resolving offsets
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:41:36 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3370
resolving offsets
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:29:47 +0200 (CEST)
Nikolas Nehmer <[email protected]> • #3369
Re: Re: Method copy using MultiMethodAdapter(?)
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:29:29 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3368
Re: Re: Method copy using MultiMethodAdapter(?)
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:23:38 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3367
Re: Method copy using MultiMethodAdapter(?)
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:52:53 -0700
Scott Vachalek <[email protected]> • #3366
Method copy using MultiMethodAdapter(?)
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:34:59 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3365
who can help me?
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:10:25 +0800
lucefe <[email protected]> • #3364
Re: Re: Re: Unexpected InternalName format on Enum classes
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:25:27 +0200
Freddy Mallet <[email protected]> • #3363
Re: Re: Re: Question for using ASM to log the method invocation trace.
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:09:11 -0700
Scott Vachalek <[email protected]> • #3362
Re: Re: Question for using ASM to log the method invocation trace.
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:14:12 -0400
Sai Zhang <[email protected]> • #3361
Re: Re: generics in ASM
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:40:30 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3360
Re: Re: Unexpected InternalName format on Enum classes
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:26:52 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3359
Re: Unexpected InternalName format on Enum classes
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:36:54 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3358
Unexpected InternalName format on Enum classes
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:14:06 +0200
Freddy Mallet <[email protected]> • #3357
Re: generics in ASM
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:15:53 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3356
Re: Re: generics in ASM
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:08:18 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3355
Re: org.objectweb.asm.tree.analysis.Frame
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:57:24 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3354
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.