gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.module-build archive

403 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

Repository commit notifications?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:21:00 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6622
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:09:02 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6621
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:53:56 -0600
"Curtis Jewell" <[email protected]> • #6620
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:13:53 +0200
Steffen Schwigon <[email protected]> • #6619
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:54:00 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6618
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:47:41 -0700
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6617
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:00:18 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6616
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:54:26 +0100
Zefram <[email protected]> • #6615
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:35:02 +0300
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6614
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:26:57 +0200
Jonas Brømsø Nielsen <[email protected]> • #6613
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:52:30 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6612
Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:51:39 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #6611
MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:57:54 +0200
Steffen Schwigon <[email protected]> • #6610
Re: [rt.cpan.org #53478] Diffs with ActiveState HTML generation and PPM compatibility
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:21:08 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6609
Re: Configure Dependency
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:23:00 +1100
Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> • #6608
Module-Build repository migrated to git
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:23:25 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6607
Question about testing subclasses of Module::Build
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:36:09 +0100
NP Bamber <[email protected]> • #6606
Re: Configure Dependency
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:17:32 +0100
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6605
Re: Configure Dependency
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:15:54 +0100
Zefram <[email protected]> • #6604
Configure Dependency
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:21:40 +0100
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6603
Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:55:42 -0500
"Christopher J. Madsen" <[email protected]> • #6602
Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:35:45 +0100 (CET)
Salve J Nilsen <[email protected]> • #6601
Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:54:56 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6600
Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:45:18 +0300
Gabor Szabo <[email protected]> • #6599
Re: Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:40:32 -0400
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6598
Adding both mozilla1.0 and mozilla1.1 to the list of licenses
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:25:12 +0300
Gabor Szabo <[email protected]> • #6597
Re: Releasing a candidate
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:21:14 +0100
[email protected] (Johan Vromans) • #6596
Re: Releasing a candidate
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:24:47 -0500
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #6595
Releasing a candidate
13 Mar 2010 13:26:17 +0100
Johan Vromans <[email protected]> • #6594
Re: Politics and Method to include modules under inc/
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:26:30 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6593
Politics and Method to include modules under inc/
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:55:31 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6592
Re: dependencies with Build.PL files
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:28:30 +0000
Zefram <[email protected]> • #6591
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:15:03 +0100
Hinnerk Altenburg <[email protected]> • #6590
Re: Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:44:56 +0100
Jozef Kutej <[email protected]> • #6589
Re: Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:10:35 -0600
brian d foy <[email protected]> • #6588
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:18:03 +1100
Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> • #6587
Re: dependencies with Build.PL files
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:57:05 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6586
Re: dependencies with Build.PL files
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:17:37 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6585
dependencies with Build.PL files
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:54:57 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6584
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. the default MANIFEST.SKIP
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:26:09 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6583
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. the default MANIFEST.SKIP
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:05:28 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6582
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. the default MANIFEST.SKIP
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:44:06 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6581
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:43:06 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6580
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:57:07 +1100
Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> • #6579
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:25:34 +1100
Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> • #6578
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:43:49 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6577
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:17:36 +0100
[email protected] (Andreas J. Koenig) • #6576
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:05:17 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6575
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:13:37 +0100
[email protected] (Andreas J. Koenig) • #6574
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:02:00 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6573
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:19:43 +0100
[email protected] (Andreas J. Koenig) • #6572
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:04:09 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6571
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:14:43 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6570
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:26:41 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6569
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:36:56 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6568
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:55:13 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6567
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:26:51 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6566
Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:27:36 +1100
Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> • #6565
MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:29:05 +0100
Hinnerk Altenburg <[email protected]> • #6564
Re: Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:47:10 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6563
Re: Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:45:20 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6562
Re: Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:01:05 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6561
Proper technique for setting a project-wide $VERSION?
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:14:05 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6560
Re: Changing the way tests are run
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:15:39 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6559
Re: Changing the way tests are run
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:42:52 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6558
Changing the way tests are run
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:33:03 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6557
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:25:59 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6556
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:15:47 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6555
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:12:02 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6554
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:45:56 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6553
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:42:55 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6552
Re: Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:19:40 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6551
Making files executable
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:25:59 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6550
Re: When was the "use lib" bug fixed?
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:59:20 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6549
When was the "use lib" bug fixed?
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:47:12 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6548
Re: [PATCH] EU::CBuilder compile supporting include_dirs as a string
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:41:39 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6547
Re: Forcing an order for build_elements
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:33:44 -0800
Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> • #6546
Re: Forcing an order for build_elements
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:32:46 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6545
Re: Forcing an order for build_elements
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:16:44 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6544
Re: Forcing an order for build_elements
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:12:34 -0800
Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> • #6543
Forcing an order for build_elements
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:26:36 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6542
[PATCH] EU::CBuilder compile supporting include_dirs as a string
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:23:25 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6541
[PATCH] Support multiple c_source directories
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:05:10 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6540
Re: Help building a C library
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:26:12 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6539
Re: Help building a C library
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:23:26 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6538
Re: Help building a C library
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:13:54 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6537
Re: Help building a C library
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:26:44 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6536
Help building a C library
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:20:15 +0000
Alberto Simões <[email protected]> • #6535
Live MakeMaker -> Module::Build conversion (was Re: Detecting where files will be placed)
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:24:09 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6534
Re: Bug Tracker #53478 and HTML documentation
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:05:20 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6533
Bug Tracker #53478 and HTML documentation
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:27:09 -0500
"Scott Renner" <[email protected]> • #6532
Re: State of Module::Build::Compat
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:00:36 -0700
"Curtis Jewell" <[email protected]> • #6531
Re: State of Module::Build::Compatg
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:40:48 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6530
Re: State of Module::Build::Compatg
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:39:25 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6529
Re: State of Module::Build::Compatg
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:15:25 -0800
Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> • #6528
Re: State of Module::Build::Compat
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:26:06 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #6527
Re: State of Module::Build::Compat
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:11:18 -0500
David Golden <[email protected]> • #6526
State of Module::Build::Compat
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:46:10 -0800
Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> • #6525
Re: Where to store module-specific read-only data?
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:04:54 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #6524
Re: Where to store module-specific read-only data?
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:39:48 +0000
Tim Landscheidt <[email protected]> • #6523
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.