gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel archive

1562 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 16). Latest articles →

Using scons as setup.py
Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:46:53 +0000
Daniel Holth <[email protected]> • #14480
Re: Setup.py questions
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:53:31 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14479
Re: Setup.py questions
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:22:08 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14478
Setup.py questions
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:41:22 -0500
Jason Kenny <[email protected]> • #14477
Re: Cross compiler environment using scons
Tue, 31 May 2016 12:06:07 +0200
Dirk Baechle <[email protected]> • #14476
Cross compiler environment using scons
Tue, 31 May 2016 14:50:23 +0530
abhishek jain <[email protected]> • #14475
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Thu, 26 May 2016 10:20:20 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14474
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:48:58 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14473
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:47:20 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14472
Re: 1st try of scons hg default on python3
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:43:39 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14471
1st try of scons hg default on python3
Thu, 26 May 2016 10:05:05 -0400
Neal Becker <[email protected]> • #14470
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Thu, 26 May 2016 10:26:22 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14469
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Thu, 26 May 2016 06:26:36 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14468
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 20:52:26 -0500
Jason Kenny <[email protected]> • #14467
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Thu, 26 May 2016 01:42:54 +0200
Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> • #14466
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 16:24:04 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14465
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Thu, 26 May 2016 01:13:15 +0200
Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> • #14464
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:32:41 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14463
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:12:31 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14462
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 23:57:51 +0200
Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> • #14461
Thought's on this pull request which cleans up all targets when control-c is pressed..
Wed, 25 May 2016 14:48:26 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14460
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 14:47:06 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14459
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 14:38:23 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14458
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:19:47 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14457
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:16:28 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14456
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:14:40 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14455
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:12:41 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14454
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 20:12:03 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14453
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:11:12 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14452
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:07:35 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14451
Re: no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 09:10:19 -0500
Jason Kenny <[email protected]> • #14450
no more print statements in SConscripts?
Wed, 25 May 2016 08:59:20 -0400
Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> • #14449
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Tue, 24 May 2016 20:26:53 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14448
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Tue, 24 May 2016 11:04:15 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14447
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Tue, 24 May 2016 19:06:54 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14446
Re: python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Tue, 24 May 2016 10:54:39 +0200
Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> • #14445
python3-port branch merged to default and then closed
Mon, 23 May 2016 16:39:37 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14444
Re: Any unexplained failures on python3-port?
Mon, 16 May 2016 17:29:00 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14443
Any unexplained failures on python3-port?
Mon, 16 May 2016 08:04:09 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14442
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 18:23:53 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14441
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 18:22:45 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14440
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 09:54:16 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14439
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 13:55:13 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14438
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 13:51:28 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14437
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sun, 15 May 2016 13:50:42 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14436
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sat, 14 May 2016 15:32:26 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14435
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Sat, 14 May 2016 15:30:45 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14434
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Fri, 13 May 2016 20:12:43 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14433
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Fri, 13 May 2016 20:11:25 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14432
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Fri, 13 May 2016 14:59:58 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14431
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Fri, 13 May 2016 14:39:31 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14430
Re: python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Fri, 13 May 2016 18:34:59 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14429
python3-port passes all test with python 2.7 on linux.. win32 has issues
Thu, 12 May 2016 22:59:27 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14428
Re: Hg vs Git
Thu, 12 May 2016 09:04:18 -0400
Neal Becker <[email protected]> • #14427
Re: pip install scons
Thu, 12 May 2016 11:22:50 +0200
Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> • #14426
Re: Hg vs Git
Thu, 12 May 2016 11:19:08 +0200
Dirk Baechle <[email protected]> • #14425
Re: Hg vs Git
Thu, 12 May 2016 11:12:19 +0200
Dirk Baechle <[email protected]> • #14424
Re: pip install scons
Thu, 12 May 2016 12:06:47 +0300
anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> • #14423
Re: Hg vs Git
Thu, 12 May 2016 10:29:51 +0300
anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> • #14422
Re: Hg vs Git
Thu, 12 May 2016 10:27:12 +0300
anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> • #14421
Re: Hg vs Git
Wed, 11 May 2016 19:03:13 +0200
Paweł Tomulik <[email protected]> • #14420
Re: Hg vs Git
Wed, 11 May 2016 09:11:58 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14419
Re: Hg vs Git
Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:02 -0400
Jonathon Reinhart <[email protected]> • #14418
Re: Hg vs Git
Tue, 10 May 2016 21:10:23 -0500
"Mark A. Flacy" <[email protected]> • #14417
Re: Hg vs Git
Tue, 10 May 2016 09:43:24 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14416
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 09 May 2016 21:21:02 -0500
"Mark A. Flacy" <[email protected]> • #14415
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 20:12:45 -0400
Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> • #14414
Re: scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 23:28:33 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14413
Re: scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 21:22:02 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14412
Re: scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 19:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
"Schleimer, Ben via Scons-dev" <[email protected]> • #14411
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 12:44:58 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14410
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 21:39:58 +0200
Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> • #14409
Re: scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 19:48:29 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14408
Re: scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 19:47:41 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14407
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 09 May 2016 19:42:59 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14406
scanning before emitting
Mon, 9 May 2016 18:25:11 +0000 (UTC)
"Schleimer, Ben via Scons-dev" <[email protected]> • #14405
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
"Schleimer, Ben via Scons-dev" <[email protected]> • #14404
Re: python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Mon, 9 May 2016 10:30:14 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14403
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 10:13:00 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14402
Re: python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Mon, 09 May 2016 17:44:18 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14401
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Mon, 09 May 2016 17:41:14 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14400
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 08:12:51 -0700
Tim Jenness <[email protected]> • #14399
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 14:57:46 +0000
Rob Boehne <[email protected]> • #14398
Re: Hg vs Git
Mon, 9 May 2016 07:54:18 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14397
Re: python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Mon, 9 May 2016 07:53:21 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14396
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Mon, 9 May 2016 07:49:12 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14395
Hg vs Git
Mon, 09 May 2016 13:42:33 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14394
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Mon, 09 May 2016 13:29:30 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14393
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Mon, 09 May 2016 13:30:33 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14392
Re: python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Mon, 09 May 2016 13:27:36 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14391
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Mon, 09 May 2016 13:33:57 +0100
Russel Winder <[email protected]> • #14390
Re: python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Sun, 8 May 2016 20:24:36 +0100
William Blevins <[email protected]> • #14389
python3-port branch in scons/scons repo has been updated with Russel Winder's python3-port branch
Sun, 8 May 2016 10:38:59 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14388
Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?
Sun, 8 May 2016 10:18:51 -0700
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14387
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 22:48:20 +0100
Krzysztof Trzciński <[email protected]> • #14386
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 14:37:00 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14385
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 18:09:27 +0100
Krzysztof Trzciński <[email protected]> • #14384
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 12:17:34 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14383
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 16:49:28 +0100
Krzysztof Trzciński <[email protected]> • #14382
Re: SCons missing dependencies (not rebuilding files when they need to be)
Fri, 6 May 2016 11:40:28 -0400
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #14381
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.