gmane.comp.python.import archive

678 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 04 May 2012 02:11:02 +0200
[email protected] • #78
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 20:05:15 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #77
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 15:43:40 -0700
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #76
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 4 May 2012 08:20:16 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #75
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 12:49:23 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #74
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 12:47:39 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #73
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 12:15:41 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #72
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 12:11:00 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #71
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 11:09:10 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #70
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 03 May 2012 11:00:26 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #69
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 10:48:43 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #68
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 03 May 2012 08:28:03 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #67
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 03 May 2012 10:37:02 +0200
[email protected] • #66
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 16:23:34 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #65
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 3 May 2012 00:37:25 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #64
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 21:23:55 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #63
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 20:58:27 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #62
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 17:05:51 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #61
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 15:47:37 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #60
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 15:40:41 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #59
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 15:39:47 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #58
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 15:28:42 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #57
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 14:53:17 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #56
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 14:50:05 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #55
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 20:32:09 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #54
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 13:53:44 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #53
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 13:24:21 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #52
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 2 May 2012 13:06:27 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #51
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 06:23:17 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #50
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Wed, 02 May 2012 09:17:00 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #49
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Tue, 1 May 2012 22:22:03 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #48
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Tue, 01 May 2012 18:00:28 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #47
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:27:19 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #46
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:52:53 -0600
Carl Meyer <[email protected]> • #45
Implementation of PEP 420
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:48:59 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #44
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:08:55 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #43
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:29:58 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #42
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:51:59 +0100
Michael Foord <[email protected]> • #41
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:10:27 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #40
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:26:06 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #39
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:06:45 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #38
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 22:50:23 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #37
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:49:16 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #36
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:06:23 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #35
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:21:31 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #34
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:15:30 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:04:59 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #32
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:56:50 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #31
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:59:56 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #30
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:10:40 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #29
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:21:32 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #28
Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:08:43 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #27
PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:18:21 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #26
Re: Replacement PEP for namespace packages
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:34:32 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #25
Re: Replacement PEP for namespace packages
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:04:53 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #24
Re: Replacement PEP for namespace packages
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:22:36 -0400
Yury Selivanov <[email protected]> • #23
Replacement PEP for namespace packages
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:55:54 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #22
Re: My objections to implicit package directories
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:26:55 -0700
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:24:52 -0700
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #20
Re: [Import-SIG] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:06:54 -0700
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #19
Re: [Import-SIG] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:05:48 -0700
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #18
Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:02:07 -0700
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #17
PEP 382 sprint
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:39:08 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #16
Re: imputil with only .pyc files
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:52:01 -0400
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #15
imputil with only .pyc files
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:28:10 -0400
Jason Waterman <[email protected]> • #14
Bug Fix for Installer
15 Jul 2002 10:25:11 -0600
Anthony Tuininga <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Imports with hooks not thread safe?
15 Jul 2002 08:47:11 -0600
Anthony Tuininga <[email protected]> • #12
Re: Imports with hooks not thread safe?
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:58:26 -0400
"Gordon McMillan" <[email protected]> • #11
Re: Imports with hooks not thread safe?
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:55:48 -0600
Anthony & Janet Tuininga <[email protected]> • #10
Re: Imports with hooks not thread safe?
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:10 -0400
"Gordon McMillan" <[email protected]> • #9
Imports with hooks not thread safe?
12 Jul 2002 15:00:23 -0600
Anthony Tuininga <[email protected]> • #8
Re: [Types-sig] Re: [meta-sig] SIG charters
Fri, 12 Jul 1996 07:33:55 +0200
Sverker Nilsson <[email protected]> • #7
Re: [meta-sig] SIG charters
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 16:50:59 -0400
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #6
SIG charters
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:14:33 -0400
[email protected] (Barry A. Warsaw) • #5
Available; Subsidies, Grants, Loans, Financing and General help.
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 06:18:57 -0400
"Canadian Subsidy Directory" <[email protected]> • #4
Entschuldigen Sie bitte die St?rung!
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:35:12 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3
Eros e soldi:guadagna con internet 0,08 euro a clic
Thu, 23 May 2002 22:24:58 +0000 (UTC)
"lolita" <[email protected]> • #2
POTTERY
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 20:21:57 +0200
"CERAMICA MEJIAS POLONIO C.B. (SPAIN)" <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.