gmane.comp.security.ids archive

930 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 10). Latest articles →

RE: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:19:12 -0700
Criss Billie - Sterling <[email protected]> • #7099
RE: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:22:45 -0400
"Joseph Laico" <[email protected]> • #7098
Re: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:43:13 -0700
Susan Bradley <[email protected]> • #7097
RE: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:23:39 -0700
"Erin Carroll" <[email protected]> • #7096
Re: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:12:37 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #7095
Re: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:07:26 +0200
Hénarès Sébastien <[email protected]> • #7094
Re: So long and thanks a bunch!
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:55:31 +0300
Yiannis Koukouras <[email protected]> • #7093
RE: So long and thanks a bunch!
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:28:20 -0700
"Erin Carroll" <[email protected]> • #7092
So long and thanks a bunch!
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:28:18 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #7091
Re: Content Inspection - Statistical methods
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:27:19 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7090
Re: AW: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:21:33 -0400
Seth Hall <[email protected]> • #7089
Re: Content Inspection - Statistical methods
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:26:59 +0100
Jamie Riden <[email protected]> • #7088
Re: IPS-Builder
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:55:36 +0800
BlueT <[email protected]> • #7087
IPS-Builder
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:38:29 -0300
Augusto Pereyra <[email protected]> • #7086
Re: Content Inspection - Statistical methods
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:03:15 -0400
Richard Bejtlich <[email protected]> • #7085
Re: Content Inspection - Statistical methods
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:59:16 +0200
Federico Maggi <[email protected]> • #7084
Content Inspection - Statistical methods
Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:45:31 +0100
Glenn Wilkinson <[email protected]> • #7083
Reputation based IPS/IDS - Cisco's tested
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:49:00 +0200
Joel Snyder <[email protected]> • #7082
AW: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:43:50 +0200
"Daniel, Akos" <[email protected]> • #7081
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:01:21 -0600
"C-Info" <[email protected]> • #7080
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:52:56 +0200
Laurens Vets <[email protected]> • #7079
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:50:01 +0000
Paul Schmehl <[email protected]> • #7078
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:45:21 +0400
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #7077
Re: RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint - Tried Arbor and Top Layer?
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:57:30 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #7076
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:55:03 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7075
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:50:27 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7074
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:21:11 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7073
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:43:49 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7072
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:26:26 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7071
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:28:08 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7070
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:58:25 -0600
[email protected] • #7069
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:43:32 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7068
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:20:11 +0200
Ronny Vaningh <[email protected]> • #7067
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:40:42 +0200
Laurens Vets <[email protected]> • #7066
Re: RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint - Tried Arbor and Top Layer?
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:10:59 -0500
Scott Wahlstrom <[email protected]> • #7065
Re: RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint - Tried Arbor and Top Layer?
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:58:33 -0300
Augusto Pereyra <[email protected]> • #7064
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:42:26 +0200
Trygve Aasheim <[email protected]> • #7063
Re: RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint - Tried Arbor and Top Layer?
29 Jul 2009 19:15:41 -0000
[email protected] • #7062
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:10:51 -0700
Joel Snyder <[email protected]> • #7061
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:07:35 -0700
Gary Halleen <[email protected]> • #7060
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:19:30 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #7059
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:32:28 -0300
"Diego Garay" <[email protected]> • #7058
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:10:43 +0000
Paul Schmehl <[email protected]> • #7057
Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:55:16 +0200
Laurens Vets <[email protected]> • #7056
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:39:39 +0000
"BARDINI, MICHAEL" <[email protected]> • #7055
RE: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:05:59 -0400
David Henning <[email protected]> • #7054
IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:25:16 +0000 (GMT)
Hurgel Bumpf <[email protected]> • #7053
Re: Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:35:23 -0400
Martin Roesch <[email protected]> • #7052
RE: Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:49:38 -0400
"Francis, Shannon" <[email protected]> • #7051
Re: Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:50:53 -0400
Paul Palmer <[email protected]> • #7050
Re: Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:43:48 -0700
Jonathon <[email protected]> • #7049
Re: Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:15:22 -0700
Aaron Turner <[email protected]> • #7048
Making my own IDS... how to detect packet loss ?
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:09:01 -0700
Jonathon <[email protected]> • #7047
Re: Honeypots, what is their limits for intrusion detection?
8 Jul 2009 13:52:33 -0000
[email protected] • #7046
Re: Honeypots, what is their limits for intrusion detection?
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:45:33 -1000
r00t <[email protected]> • #7045
Re: Honeypots, what is their limits for intrusion detection?
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:49:47 -0400
Albert Gonzalez <[email protected]> • #7044
Honeypots, what is their limits for intrusion detection?
Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:18:53 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7043
Extended deadline: Monday, July 6th. Workshop on the Analysis of System Logs (WASL) 2009
Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:40:26 -0700
Greg Bronevetsky <[email protected]> • #7042
Re: Snort with an expert system
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:23:08 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7041
Re: Snort with an expert system
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:30:29 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7040
Re: Snort with an expert system
Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:46:28 -0400
Martin Roesch <[email protected]> • #7039
Re: Snort with an expert system
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:18:53 -0700
Gary Halleen <[email protected]> • #7038
Re: Snort with an expert system
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:00:03 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #7037
Re: Snort with an expert system
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:30:45 -0700
"Stuart Staniford" <[email protected]> • #7036
Re: Snort with an expert system
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:14:07 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7035
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:18:00 -0700
Gary Halleen <[email protected]> • #7034
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:07 -0700
Gary Halleen <[email protected]> • #7033
Re: Snort with an expert system
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:17:23 -0400
Martin Roesch <[email protected]> • #7032
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:12:31 -0400
Richard Bejtlich <[email protected]> • #7031
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:29:02 -0400
Martin Roesch <[email protected]> • #7030
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:55:50 -0500
Greg Shipley <[email protected]> • #7029
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:08:35 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #7028
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:25:03 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7027
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:19:07 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7026
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:28 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7025
Re: Announcing Allthreats
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:39:07 -0500
Will Metcalf <[email protected]> • #7024
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:45:22 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7023
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:04:27 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7022
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:46:47 +0200
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]> • #7021
Re: AW: Announcing Allthreats
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:16:55 -0400
Ismael Briones <[email protected]> • #7020
Re: Snort with an expert system
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:08:52 +0200
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> • #7019
RE: AW: Announcing Allthreats
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:55:59 -0400
"Ali-Reza Anghaie" <[email protected]> • #7018
Re: AW: Announcing Allthreats
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:31:04 -0400
Ismael Briones <[email protected]> • #7017
AW: Announcing Allthreats
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:54:43 +0200
"Daniel, Akos" <[email protected]> • #7016
Announcing Allthreats
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:00:03 -0400
Ismael Briones <[email protected]> • #7015
Can a Bypass Switch Prevent Link Flapping - When inline device fails?
23 Jun 2009 11:51:25 -0000
[email protected] • #7014
Re: Re: Snort with an expert system
22 Jun 2009 19:47:03 -0000
[email protected] • #7013
Workshop on the Analysis of System Logs (WASL) 2009
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:16:29 -0700
Greg Bronevetsky <[email protected]> • #7012
AW: An insider attack scenario
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:56:31 +0200
"Daniel, Akos" <[email protected]> • #7011
Re: An insider attack scenario
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:05:16 +0100
Nick Besant <[email protected]> • #7010
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:59:55 -0500
Todd Haverkos <[email protected]> • #7009
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Tommy May <[email protected]> • #7008
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:03:40 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #7007
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:12:29 -0400
Thrynn <[email protected]> • #7006
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:46:06 -0400
Ron Gula <[email protected]> • #7005
Re: An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:55:33 -0700
Jeremy Bennett <[email protected]> • #7004
An insider attack scenario
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:24:44 -0600
[email protected] • #7003
Re: Fingerprinting IDS sensors?
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:26:16 -0400
Stephen Mullins <[email protected]> • #7002
AW: Need help/info
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:11:13 +0200
"Daniel, Akos" <[email protected]> • #7001
Re: Fingerprinting IDS sensors?
Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:14:30 -0400
Ron Gula <[email protected]> • #7000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.