gmane.comp.security.intrusions archive

711 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 8). Latest articles →

[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6085
[LOGS] 246 new attack events
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:27:50 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #6084
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:22:05 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6083
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:00:09 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6082
Re: Fwd: Smith Barney: Confirm Your Details To AvoidService Cancellation [Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:32:34 +0300]
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:48:55 +0800
"STST" <[email protected]> • #6081
More on: 8.1M hits message
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:13:10 -0400
"Don Murdoch" <[email protected]> • #6080
Re: Re: Smith Barney Phishing Attempt....
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:56:22 -0700
Eric Peters <[email protected]> • #6079
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:11:22 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6078
Re: Smith Barney Phishing Attempt....
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:28:45 -0400
[email protected] • #6077
Re: Fwd: Smith Barney: Confirm Your Details To AvoidService Cancellation [Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:32:34 +0300]
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:10:19 -0500
"Chris Norton" <[email protected]> • #6076
Fwd: Smith Barney: Confirm Your Details To Avoid Service Cancellation [Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:32:34 +0300]
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:58:38 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #6075
Re: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:46:38 -0400
Joel Esler <[email protected]> • #6074
RE: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:04:08 -0600
"Smith, Donald" <[email protected]> • #6073
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:02:57 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6072
Re: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Mary <[email protected]> • #6071
RE: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:54:26 -0400
"Bill Royds" <[email protected]> • #6070
Re: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Merton Campbell Crockett <[email protected]> • #6069
Re: 8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:18:12 -0500
"Chris Norton" <[email protected]> • #6068
Re: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:12:39 -0500
Ken Connelly <[email protected]> • #6067
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:40:41 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6066
8.1M hits in minutes w/ this traffic ...
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:54:48 -0400
"Don Murdoch" <[email protected]> • #6065
Re: tcpdump results
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6064
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:13:29 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6063
Re: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sat, 09 Oct 2004 01:12:22 -0700
"Jason \"JC\" Monroe" <[email protected]> • #6062
Re: tcpdump results
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 08:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6061
Re: tcpdump results
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6060
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:04:46 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6059
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:44:28 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6058
Re: tcpdump results
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6057
Re: tcpdump results
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6056
RE: tcpdump results
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:47:26 -0600
"Smith, Donald" <[email protected]> • #6055
Re: tcpdump results
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:53:54 -0400
Judy Novak <[email protected]> • #6054
Re: tcpdump results
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:33:19 -0400
[email protected] • #6053
Re: tcpdump results
Wed, 06 Oct 2004 22:03:05 -0400 (EDT)
opiesan <[email protected]> • #6052
Re: tcpdump results
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:02:23 -0400
Dana Webber <[email protected]> • #6051
tcpdump results
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
Donald Cunningham <[email protected]> • #6050
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6049
Re: LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 PracticalDetect DarinMarais
Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:45:12 +0200
"lola marais" <[email protected]> • #6048
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:39:31 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6047
RE: Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - Update and Clarification
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:46:03 -0400
"James C Slora Jr" <[email protected]> • #6046
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:35:44 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6045
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sun, 03 Oct 2004 15:39:28 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6044
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:32:34 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6043
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:12:43 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6042
Re: Winupdate2date.exe: New worm variant?
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:43:41 +0200
Benjamin Koch <[email protected]> • #6041
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:08:40 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6040
Even more GDI confusion
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:39:42 -0700
"Tina Bird" <[email protected]> • #6039
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:36:47 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6038
RE: LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical DetectDarinMarais
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:17:32 -0400
"Barnett, Ryan C. (EDS)" <[email protected]> • #6037
Re: LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect DarinMarais
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:37:45 +0100
Steve Hall <[email protected]> • #6036
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:18:05 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6035
LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect DarinMarais
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:05:44 +0200
"lola marais" <[email protected]> • #6034
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:27:59 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6033
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:42:30 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6032
Re: Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - NOT Nachi
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:14:43 -0400
"James C. Slora Jr." <[email protected]> • #6031
RE: Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - NOT Nachi
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:45:21 -0600
"Smith, Donald" <[email protected]> • #6030
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:10:26 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6029
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:58:39 -0700
Timothy Chase <[email protected]> • #6028
Re: Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - NOT Nachi
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:28:04 GMT
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #6027
RE: Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - NOT Nachi
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:03:59 -0400
"Aaron Lewis" <[email protected]> • #6026
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:45:33 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6025
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:06:55 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6024
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:01:55 -0400
don murdoch <[email protected]> • #6023
Traffic spoofed from Localhost 80 - NOT Nachi
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:44:48 -0400
"James C Slora Jr" <[email protected]> • #6022
RE: [unisog] Winupdate2date.exe: New worm variant? ( The Answer)
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:02:44 -0700
Eric Peters <[email protected]> • #6021
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:26:46 -0500
"Chris Norton" <[email protected]> • #6020
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:54:12 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6019
RE: Interesting little piece of malware...
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:22:39 -0700
"Hubbard, Dan" <[email protected]> • #6018
Re: Winupdate2date.exe: New worm variant?
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:24:57 +0200
Benjamin Koch <[email protected]> • #6017
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:51:22 -0700
"Matthew Sowers" <[email protected]> • #6016
Winupdate2date.exe: New worm variant? (The Answer)
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:00:19 -0400 (EDT)
Anderson Johnston <[email protected]> • #6015
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:01:06 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6014
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:49:05 -0500
"Chris Norton" <[email protected]> • #6013
RE: Interesting little piece of malware...
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:36:37 -0400
"Chris Harrintgon" <[email protected]> • #6012
Winupdate2date.exe: New worm variant?
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
Anderson Johnston <[email protected]> • #6011
RE: Port 13227
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:03:56 +1000
"Mark Hofman" <[email protected]> • #6010
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:31:29 -0400
don murdoch <[email protected]> • #6009
Re: tcpdump one-liner
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Stingley <[email protected]> • #6008
Re: Port 13227
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:16:10 -0500
Kyle Maxwell <[email protected]> • #6007
RE: LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect MarkStingley
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Stingley <[email protected]> • #6006
RE: referral on security audit
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:41:37 -0500
<[email protected]> • #6005
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:04:41 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6004
Port 13227
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:13:07 +1000
"Mark Hofman" <[email protected]> • #6003
Re: Intrusions Digest, Vol 6, Issue 32
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:43:31 -0400
otaku otaku <[email protected]> • #6002
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:07:38 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #6001
RE: LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect MarkStingley
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:50:10 -0600
"Smith, Donald" <[email protected]> • #6000
LOGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect Mark Stingley
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Stingley <[email protected]> • #5999
Re: [Non-intrusion Q] Is this normal FTP and TCP"underneath it" behavior?
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:42:42 -0500
Stef <[email protected]> • #5998
RE: [Non-intrusion Q] Is this normal FTP and TCP"underneath it" behavior?
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:05:05 -0400
"Bill Royds" <[email protected]> • #5997
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:05:46 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #5996
[Non-intrusion Q] Is this normal FTP and TCP "underneath it" behavior?
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:47:44 -0500
Stef <[email protected]> • #5995
OGS: GIAC GCIA Version 3.5 Practical Detect Alexander Schinner
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 09:33:57 +0200
Alexander Schinner <[email protected]> • #5994
Re: Interesting little piece of malware...
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:04:12 -0400
don murdoch <[email protected]> • #5993
Re: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:37:03 -0400
Barry Fitzgerald <[email protected]> • #5992
Re: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:22:14 -0500
Kyle Maxwell <[email protected]> • #5991
Re: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:22:14 -0600
Ben Nelson <[email protected]> • #5990
RE: [LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detec ts
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:26:51 +0200
Patrik Sternudd <[email protected]> • #5989
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:40:06 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #5988
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:36:31 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #5987
[LOGS] Summary of large-scale portscanning detects
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:36:14 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #5986
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.