gmane.comp.security.virus archive

452 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:50:46 -0400
sekure <[email protected]> • #2480
RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Sun, 4 Jun 2006 14:21:00 -0700
"Benny Czarny" <[email protected]> • #2479
RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:02:36 -0500
"Howe, Paul H" <[email protected]> • #2478
RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:20:35 +0100
[email protected] • #2477
RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:54:52 -0400
"Shabbar Arsiwala" <[email protected]> • #2476
RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:30:32 +0200
"Serge Vondandamo" <[email protected]> • #2475
re: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:17:29 +0100
[email protected] • #2474
Symantec AV reporting metrics.
Sat, 3 Jun 2006 10:50:55 +0200
"Serge Vondandamo" <[email protected]> • #2473
Re: New SecurityFocus mailing list: Focus-Apple
Wed, 31 May 2006 13:57:02 -0600 (MDT)
Marc Fossi <[email protected]> • #2472
New SecurityFocus mailing list: Focus-Apple
Wed, 31 May 2006 10:21:01 -0600 (MDT)
Marc Fossi <[email protected]> • #2471
deadline extended for CFP of the IEEE S&P special issue on malware
Mon, 29 May 2006 16:59:29 -0300
Ivan Arce <[email protected]> • #2470
Re: Fwd: Social viruses ? (Hi5, Ringo, etc.)
27 May 2006 12:00:29 -0000
[email protected] • #2469
Re: blocking BHX files with MIME
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:26:03 +1200
Nick FitzGerald <[email protected]> • #2468
Re: blocking BHX files with MIME
Wed, 17 May 2006 03:33:16 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Kosinar <[email protected]> • #2467
Re: blocking BHX files with MIME
Wed, 17 May 2006 19:17:43 +0100
"lsi" <[email protected]> • #2466
Indemnifying virus handlers - 'Hold harmless' statements of work?
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:24:12 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2465
blocking BHX files with MIME
Tue, 16 May 2006 12:53:11 +0100
"lsi" <[email protected]> • #2464
RE: RE: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Thu, 11 May 2006 19:39:35 -0500
[email protected] • #2463
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Thu, 11 May 2006 08:59:04 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2462
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Thu, 11 May 2006 08:53:13 -0500
"Christian Stankevitz" <[email protected]> • #2461
RE: RE: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Thu, 11 May 2006 09:50:34 -0400
"Evan Mann" <[email protected]> • #2460
Re: RE: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
11 May 2006 02:05:30 -0000
[email protected] • #2459
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Thu, 11 May 2006 13:58:14 +1200
"Nick FitzGerald" <[email protected]> • #2458
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 13:37:46 -0500
"Clemens, Dan" <[email protected]> • #2457
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 14:51:21 -0400
Kenneth Bechtel <[email protected]> • #2456
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 11:58:14 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2455
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 14:58:34 -0400
Kenneth Bechtel <[email protected]> • #2454
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 10:02:59 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2453
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:30 +1200
Nick FitzGerald <[email protected]> • #2452
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Tue, 9 May 2006 11:04:53 -0400
Kenneth Bechtel <[email protected]> • #2451
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Wed, 10 May 2006 03:15:57 +1200
Nick FitzGerald <[email protected]> • #2450
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Tue, 9 May 2006 21:58:17 +0200
"Yuri Slobodyanyuk" <[email protected]> • #2449
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Tue, 9 May 2006 10:55:14 -0500
"Hayes, Bill" <[email protected]> • #2448
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Tue, 09 May 2006 13:11:28 -0400
Robert Sandilands <[email protected]> • #2447
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Tue, 9 May 2006 09:40:30 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2446
RE: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Mon, 8 May 2006 14:56:31 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2445
Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Mon, 8 May 2006 17:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
Jose Nazario <[email protected]> • #2444
Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Mon, 8 May 2006 13:37:24 -0700
"Bill Stout" <[email protected]> • #2443
Re: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Tue, 2 May 2006 18:12:20 -0400
"Bruce Martins" <[email protected]> • #2442
RE: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Tue, 2 May 2006 17:39:02 -0400
"Evan Mann" <[email protected]> • #2441
RE: McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Tue, 2 May 2006 17:30:36 -0400
"Ziots, Edward" <[email protected]> • #2440
McAfee 8.0 crashing Dell D620's
Tue, 2 May 2006 17:04:26 -0400
"Evan Mann" <[email protected]> • #2439
Re: Dialer.gzt?
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:47:39 -0400
Robert Sandilands <[email protected]> • #2438
POXDAR Revisited
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:57:53 +0800
"Mark Ryan del Moral Talabis" <[email protected]> • #2437
Re: Dialer.gzt?
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:17:33 +0300
Andrei Saygo <[email protected]> • #2436
Re: Dialer.gzt?
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:05:25 +0200
Julio Canto <[email protected]> • #2435
Re: Dialer.gzt?
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:23:43 +0200
Axel Pettinger <[email protected]> • #2434
Dialer.gzt?
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:04:48 -0600
"Casey DeBerry" <[email protected]> • #2433
Newslist about security conference
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:19:38 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #2432
RE: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:35:37 -0600
"Loesch, Jason (STP)" <[email protected]> • #2430
RE: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:03:05 -0500
"Butler, Theodore" <[email protected]> • #2429
Re: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:49:59 +0100
Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <[email protected]> • #2428
RE: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:34:23 -0500
"Mike" <[email protected]> • #2427
RE: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:11:02 -0500
"Mark P. Larios" <[email protected]> • #2426
RE: What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:06:08 -0500
"Evan Mann" <[email protected]> • #2425
What should be protected with anti-virus software?
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:06:20 -0600
"Erdahl, Larry E" <[email protected]> • #2424
Was it MyDoom?
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:58:08 +0500
Amazed <[email protected]> • #2423
Re: New VB SMTP worm
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:57:13 +0200
"Toni Koivunen" <[email protected]> • #2422
New VB SMTP worm
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:42:27 -0500
"Lawson, Joseph" <[email protected]> • #2421
Re: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:16:59 -0500
bkfsec <[email protected]> • #2420
Sober
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 07:18:49 -0700
"Byrne, David" <[email protected]> • #2418
RE: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:03:28 -0600
[email protected] • #2417
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:10:04 +0100
David Ballester - Kern Pharma <[email protected]> • #2416
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:07:00 -0500
Wyman Miles <[email protected]> • #2415
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:06:56 -0600
"Gregory D. Rosenberg" <[email protected]> • #2414
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:26:14 +0200
"Johanna Manninen" <[email protected]> • #2413
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:07:31 -0500
"Tyler" <[email protected]> • #2412
RE: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:43:54 -0500
"Larry Seltzer" <[email protected]> • #2411
RE: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:14:24 +0200
"Catalin V. Acatrinei" <[email protected]> • #2410
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 19:24:20 +0100
Harald Nesland <[email protected]> • #2408
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:13:27 -0600
"Kevin Russell" <[email protected]> • #2407
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:43:19 -0500
"Alice Hart" <[email protected]> • #2406
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:42:27 -0200
Daniel Ferreira de Lima <[email protected]> • #2405
Re: Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 19:36:52 +0100
"Varga Endre" <[email protected]> • #2404
Are there any LiveCD antivirus solutions?
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:18:06 +0100
"Varga Endre" <[email protected]> • #2403
Re: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Greg van der Gaast <[email protected]> • #2402
Re: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:36:37 +1030
Damon McMahon <[email protected]> • #2401
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:30:39 -0500
"Mike" <[email protected]> • #2400
Re: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:35:44 +0100
francois <[email protected]> • #2399
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:11:03 -0500
"Mark P. Larios" <[email protected]> • #2398
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:04:16 -0500
"Brooks, Shane" <[email protected]> • #2397
RE: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:47:30 -0500
"Fredericks, Michael" <[email protected]> • #2396
Re: Hijacked Internet Explorer
4 Jan 2006 13:01:25 -0000
[email protected] • #2395
Re: Hijacked Internet Explorer
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:08:59 -0500
jayjwa <[email protected]> • #2394
Hijacked Internet Explorer
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:01:28 -0700
Chris Barber <[email protected]> • #2393
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:29:09 -0500
"Mark Brunner" <[email protected]> • #2392
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:04:00 -0500
[email protected] • #2391
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:48:51 -0000
"Harley David" <[email protected]> • #2390
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:26:12 -0500
"Shaffer, Bruce" <[email protected]> • #2389
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:26:39 -0500
"Dowling, Gabrielle" <[email protected]> • #2388
Re: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:42:56 -0500
Robert Sandilands <[email protected]> • #2387
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:39:34 -0800
"Sewell, Cathy" <[email protected]> • #2386
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:09:18 -0500
"Mark Brunner" <[email protected]> • #2385
Re: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:13:35 -0500
Robert Sandilands <[email protected]> • #2384
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:37:01 -0700
"Steven Hay" <[email protected]> • #2383
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:43:11 -0500
"Mark Brunner" <[email protected]> • #2382
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:46:12 -0000
"James Knowles" <[email protected]> • #2381
RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:42:30 -0500
"Derick Anderson" <[email protected]> • #2380
Re: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:07:05 -0500
[email protected] • #2379
Re: Do we still need scheduled scan?
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:43:45 -0500
"Bruce Martins" <[email protected]> • #2378
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.