gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch archive
2357 archived articles, newest first (page 14 of 24). Latest articles →
Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:51:05 -0500RE: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:10:27 -0800Re: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:52:18 -0800FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:07:34 -0800RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:30:58 -0600RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:10:29 -0800RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:58:06 -0800Re: P3P Hairball??
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:22:07 -0500RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:56:30 -0000Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:12:25 -0500RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:56:18 -0000RE: RM and RC, our experience
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:56:16 -0000Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:45:47 +0100RE: web service and Web service
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:52:48 -0600P3P Hairball??
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:47:23 -0600[MTF] Conf Call Minutes 12/18/02
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:40:11 -0500Re: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestrati on
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:02:28 -0800ebXML Messaging Specification link
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:54:32 -0800RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestrati on
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:45:07 -0800web service and Web service
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:23:03 -0500RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:04:59 -0800RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:31:25 -0600Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:17:34 -0500RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:31:59 -0800Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:18:01 -0500RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:46:44 -0500Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:28:01 -0500RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:44:28 -0500Re: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:09:24 -0800RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:03:25 -0700Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:57:01 -0500WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:24:27 -0700Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:39:28 -0800Architectural interaction
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:00:30 -0500RM and RC, our experience
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:54:43 +1100Re: WSA constraints
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:20:51 -0500RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:52:37 -0800RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:49:32 -0500RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:49:24 -0500Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:29:41 -0500RE: WSA constraints
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:23:03 -0700WSA constraints
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:51:06 -0500Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:35:01 -0500RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:34:48 -0800RE: Message Expiry
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:22:43 -0800Correction - RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:47:23 -0500RE: Message Expiry
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:07:36 -0800Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:16:42 -0000RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:24:19 -0700RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:01:15 -0800Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:03:53 -0500RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:36:00 -0500RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:17:21 -0800Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:19:35 -0500RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:58:38 -0800RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:51:14 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:37:52 -0800RE: Message Expiry
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:30:24 -0800Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:57:34 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:37:33 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging Summary - Cont
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:38:03 -0800RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:35:40 -0600eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:28:23 -0800Reliable Messaging Summary - Cont
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:54:06 -0600RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:06:29 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:06:14 -0800RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:06:00 -0800RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels o f Rel iable Messaging)
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:00:08 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:55:18 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:53:41 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:48:25 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:38:29 -0800RE: Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:13:29 -0800Re: Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:03:27 -0800RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:42:33 -0600Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:51:15 -0800RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:17:57 -0500RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:38:54 -0800RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:28:30 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:21:56 -0800RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:18:49 -0800Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:13:21 -0500RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:10:27 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:09:08 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:41:12 -0800RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:59:49 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:36:14 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 14:06:21 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:59:53 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 15:37:24 -0600RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 15:32:00 -0600RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 15:27:15 -0600RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:08:52 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:58:30 -0800RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:58:26 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:26:08 -0800RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:17:53 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 10:17:44 -0800Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 07:48:01 -0800RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 00:26:37 -0800
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.